Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nifty
Haven't seen this scenario mentioned yet:
In women’s sports, it is an absolute mystery how none of the liberals applauding this move have apparently even considered the inherent dangers in essentially allowing rich adult men to pay young female athletes, potentially based almost purely on their physical attractiveness.

Many of these women are teenagers in financially compromised positions, and men can now pay them lots of money for say an “autograph,” or an endorsement of their business, all with inherent plausible deniability.

Gee, what could possibly go wrong there?!


15 posted on 07/08/2021 7:28:38 AM PDT by Bratch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Bratch

That happens now.

This just makes the price more transparent.


21 posted on 07/08/2021 7:35:23 AM PDT by redgolum (If this is civilization, I will be the barbarian. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Bratch

So we don’t believe in the free market if a woman under 25 is involved somewhere?


30 posted on 07/08/2021 7:47:57 AM PDT by Renfrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson