Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: OA5599

A sailor directly involved in shooting a warhead would have a strong incentive to keep quiet about it. I agree that the rest of the crew would be unlikely to keep quiet, assuming they knew, particularly as it is now 25 years since then.

The Normandy and three subs were in the immediate vicinity at the time.

We have hundreds of witnesses of varying reliability saying missile.

We have Stephanopoulus and Kerry saying the plane was shot down.

In a coincidence paralleling Epstein’s demise, “Family members were told that all three satellites were malfunctioning on July 17.”
https://www.cashill.com/archive/twa800/10th_anny_10of10.htm

Navy and fuel tank both seem unlikely, but something happened. FBI, CIA and NTSB behavior seem suspicious.


57 posted on 07/10/2021 12:48:19 PM PDT by Tymesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: Tymesup

The USS Normandy was too far away (about double an SM-2’s range) and submarines don’t have anti-aircraft missiles.


60 posted on 07/12/2021 10:33:16 AM PDT by OA5599
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson