Andrea Stroh Thompson, Judge 416th District Court
Posted on 07/08/2021 4:26:38 AM PDT by gattaca
blackrobes insert Islamic Law, Maltese Law, Vatican Law,
and their own corruption, greed, and SEDITION.
America will not survive and cannot survive with these
traitors to the US Constitution.
Divorce is a racket invented to make money. In Australia, which I have never lived but I know several people who do live there... in Australia both parties fill out a form submit to the local Clerk and the divorce is finalized through the clerk’s office.
Why do we have to do all this unnecessary BS?
I’d tell the Sharia / Islamic court the Judge is gay and demand justice be handed out from the top of the Sears tower.
In most states in the US uncontested divorce is cheap and easy too. It’s when it is contested that it gets expensive.
That's why creepy Joe, a totally mentally incompetent boob as potus is perfectly representative for the office.
When all is said and done, I figure the ragheads and the cartels will be fighting for the scraps that used to be the USA.
A “registered Republican”, most likely in the vein of Toast Romney and Lightloafers Graham.
Da judges short bio
https://trellis.law/judge/andrea.stroh.thompson
“ Ayad Hashim Latif, revealed that on the day of their wedding in 2008, she had signed an Islamic prenuptial agreement to have all matters regarding the marriage and divorce be decided according to Sharia law.”
Click bait
This story only reinforces the fact that there are a LOT of incredibly stupid blogs out there, including conservative blogs.
Marriage is a contract. That contract can be modified with premarital agreements. Those agreements can - and sometimes do - contain ‘Choice of Law’ provisions. What’s a ‘Choice of Law’ provision? It’s a clause that stipulates what national law will be applied to the contract.
Is there AMPLE case law that supports foreign law be used in the execution of premarital (prenuptial in some circles) agreements? You bet. They’re INCREDIBLY common in NY and are used routinely by....observant Jews living in communal sects. And, those agreements are also routinely enforced by the Court.
The moral of the story is if you don’t want your marital assets divided using a framework established by Hasidic or Islamic law, then don’t sign a prenuptial agreement mandating just that.
I agree. She signed the papers. I hope she gets nothing. Ignorance isn’t a way to win in court. Heck an American court would screw the husband. This way maybe there will be some equity. Maybe she will move back to the place she came from. Bonus!
Clerks are cheaper than lawyers, and lawyers in this country control the processing and submission of a catalog of items necessary for a judge to maje a determination. It is a skewed system which is heavily weighted against the male. The male must first prove that he’s an okay guy before anything happens. No matter how big a dirtbag the wife is, males are always put on the defensive in a courtroom. It’s complete total BS.
islam is wholly incompatible with Western Civilization.
Period.
L
“Why do we have to do all this unnecessary BS?”
So lawyers can make easy money.
My divorce from my first wife cost me plenty. Over an extended period of time.
She got mad at her new boyfriend? She took me to court.
She got mad at the idiot she married? She took me to court.
She once had me in court four times in two months.
Each time she begged poverty and the judge ordered I pay her attorney. My lawyer cost me $500 each court date. Her lawyer charged me $3,000 each court date. That was 40 years ago.
Like I said, in many states you simply fill in an form pay the filing fee and wait the requisite period of time.
A prenup is a contract
A contract must lawful
The sharia court is not legal and lawful
The contract is not enforceable
In this instance, I don’t have too much sympathy.
The modern secular (anti-)Family Law system is not for family and has zero respect for the status quo (eg Christian) in a family.
Easy to say that one was hoodwinked in order to get out of a contract.
Sucks to be mooslime. deal with it.
Exactly right.
She’s a Republican.
I am willing to bet that before she became a Judge, she experienced women breaking prenups to the detriment of her male Family Law clients.
As far as I am concerned, a contract is a contract. So long as there is no real abuse involved, look at it as religious mediation.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.