“Except for the reality that it isn’t.”
I’m ready to hear your argument as to why it isn’t a non-FDA approved experimental gene therapy. Care to offer up any thing but a statement with nothing to back it up? I’m not being a smart a$$. Just curious as to why you disagree?
Gene therapy involves making changes to a person’s DNA in order to effect a result.
The mRNA platform does not and cannot enter the nucleus (which is where DNA is stored, does not and cannot unravel DNA strands, split strands, perform cuts, perform inserts, or perform repairs. Rather, the mRNA platform relies on delivering mRNA to the cellular cytoplasm, which is where ribosomes are, so that said ribosomes can do the only job they do, which is to take mRNA and produce the encoded amino acids or proteins.
The “argument” for why it isn’t gene therapy is that it doesn’t fit the definition for “gene therapy” by any stretch of the imagination.