As someone with a mentally ill relative, I find this case disturbing. One of the things disturbing is how many people openly speak of allowing the mentally ill to make life altering decisions as if they weren’t mentally ill.
Being able to perform on a stage doesn’t shout out to me that this is someone able to take care of herself. Maybe it is and if that’s the case, she has to convince a psychiatric team that she’s able to be independent.
I don’t understand this story. Why doesn’t she just quit performing?
........in my opinion, she needs and should have her own independent lawyer working for her who is not PAID by Brittney’s father. And, if she want’s to fire him/her/it she should be able to.
The court can monitor payments to the lawyer and the court can oversee Britney firing the lawyer. Too much CONTROL has been given to the father.
Demagoguery. This is not about birth control. It is about her judgment and capacity to take care of herself. A performance on stage is irrelevant to the ultimate question.
iDk any specifics about her case, I don’t follow celebrity much. But I have been involved in various ways with many people dealing with competency issues and guardianship/conservatorship.
When a child or potential child is involved, decisions become more consequential. Furthermore, courts are a sh*tty way of resolving these issues. Judges and lawyers generally have no expertise or competence in making these decisions, but there is no other mechanism. The only
alternative is to let go and hope nobody gets hurt too badly. That may satisfy civil libertarians, but at a great cost when it doesn’t end well.
It’s really telling that they never got her the help she needed instead opting to control her and dope her out of her mind so they could keep milking the cash cow she provided.
If she has mental issues, then they are enslaving her and most likely making her condition worse by using her to make piles of cash..
It is just sick sick sick
People have just lept to the conclusion that this is true?