Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fwdude

Where in the Constitution does it talk about reinstatement? A president who did something illegal to become president could be impeached. And if hes impeached device president becomes president until hes impeached, leaves office, or voluntarily steps down. Please show me where in the Constitution it talks about reinstatement? Mark off


5 posted on 06/27/2021 9:33:25 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: nickcarraway

Even though Sidney Powell thinks the election can be nullified, I doubt that. I’m not a lawyer. I’m an engineer. But I believe that the only result of showing that the election was fraudulent would be removal from office.

That being said, I visited this thread in order to point out that the Sidney Powell’s of the world may have an unlikely friend. If the election of Biden was not legitimate, then the election of Harris was equally fraudulent. Who would benefit from the removal of both Biden and Harris simultaneously? Nancy Pelosi might just sit back and watch the fireworks rather than allow the House to interfere.


13 posted on 06/27/2021 9:41:23 PM PDT by the_Watchman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Establishing fact and historical accuracy is ALWAYS worth pursuing for it’s own sake, irrespective of any other consideration.

If the truth casts doubt on the legitimacy of this criminal, destructive, and tyrannically inclined regime, then so much the better.

But there is a constitutional way that Trump could be reinstated. This method is utterly unlikely and improbable, because it would involve a regard for honor and integrity that the ruthless, unscrupulous and evil DEMONRATS are utterly devoid of. But were it to be coupled with the threat of criminal indictment for crimes against the state due to willful complicity with massive electoral fraud or other such adjudication, then it might have an outside chance. (VERY outside, I admit)

On Oct 10 1973, while facing charges of corruption and tax evasion, Spiro Agnew resigned the vice presidency, and President Nixon appointed Gerald Ford to the position. We all know what happened subsequently when Richard Nixon was facing a bi-partisan impeachment over Watergate. Ford became POTUS.

Similarly, envision Harris being compelled to resign after actual evidence has established beyond any doubt that massive electoral fraud has occurred, along with the already well established constitutional violations involving the Article II elector process and state legislative authority; and a revelation that Trump was actually the electoral victor. Harris is compelled to resign, whether because of pressure from potential prosecution, or because she has been “convinced” that her resignation is in the best interests of the nation. Biden, under overwhelming pressure to avoid the joint, appoints Trump as VP to avoid prosecution. Biden then resigns, and Trump becomes POTUS legally and constitutionally. The XXV amendment does require a majority confirmation of both houses of Congress, and that is where the public pressure would intervene to demand such a confirmation.

Again, all this relies upon the electoral fraud being established and widely accepted, (which I believe will ultimately occur) and a certain measure of honor and integrity from the least likely possessors of it in the nation, the DEMONRATS. So like others here who engage in wild speculation, I am simply posing food for thought.

But notice, there IS a way for Trump to be reinstated, (if not by August) no matter how unlikely, and it seems to me to be a better solution then one arrived at by force of arms.

There is a high likelihood that Trump may have received as many as 85 million votes. Imagine the political pressure from just 10% of this pissed off electorate, in possession of solid evidence that the election had been stolen from them by the connivance of foreign state actors and corrupt Blue State DEMONRATS.

Again, the ascension of Gerald Ford to the presidency was as unlikely a political event as any in history, until the threat of punitive adjudication forced a heretofore unprecedented two executive branch resignations.

No matter what, we must NEVER stop trying to arrive at the truth of this greatest fraud in US history.


14 posted on 06/27/2021 9:43:00 PM PDT by DMZFrank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Fraud vitiates all.


20 posted on 06/27/2021 9:50:34 PM PDT by Nipfan (The desire to save humanity is always a false front for the urge to rule it - H L Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway
Where in the Constitution does it talk about reinstatement?

No, it doesn't mention "reinstatement" per se. The constitutional issue is the right of the state legislatures to "cure" their presidential elector certifications. Since that isn't prohibited elsewhere in the constitution, it is a reserved power through the Tenth Amendment. It will be quite ironic when the same people who insisted that illegal ballots must be cured, will claim that fraudulent election certifications can't be cured!
35 posted on 06/27/2021 10:38:50 PM PDT by Dr. Franklin ("A republic, if you can keep it." )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

If I came into your house and stole your TV, I don’t get to keep it after I’m caught.


38 posted on 06/27/2021 11:02:23 PM PDT by Luircin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: nickcarraway

Yeah I don’t understand where this idea of reinstatement comes from. It’s wishful thinking. We don’t have a process for undoing stolen elections.

Biden, Obama and the whole criminal gang could openly announce that they stole the election through massive vote fraud and nothing would happen.

The only positive that could come out of these audits is that the American people as a whole could finally demand secure voting. Voter ID. An end to anything that allows elections to be gamed.

Mexico of all places has a very secure voting system. The only reason that we don’t is because the thieves controlling the Democratic party are adamantly opposed to secure voting and the spineless Republican party won’t force the issue.


70 posted on 06/28/2021 7:24:12 AM PDT by Pelham (No more words, now we fight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson