The duo of reports provide a seemingly conflicting message to the urgency of addressing the problems.
"Still, another 14-page report, which cites an inspection started on Aug. 1, 2018, and completed early the next month, called the condition of the structure “good” on five measures, noting that there was a lack of apparent issues like bulging and settling. That report also cited the waterproofing problem but called cracking in the concrete framing system: “Not significant.”
WSJ June 26, 2021: Another report from the same firm gave the building top grades on several measures
Thanks for posting this. These discrepancies are very disturbing, to say the least.
“same engineering firm created another report”
Wonder how much money changed hands?