Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congress Moves to Repeal OCC’s “True Lender” Rule
JD Supra ^ | May 29, 2021 | Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman

Posted on 06/24/2021 2:01:21 PM PDT by gattaca

TAKEAWAYS The Senate has voted to repeal the True Lender Rule using the Congressional Review Act, a measure allowing Congress to disapprove of agency actions and nullify recently adopted administrative rules.

The True Lender Rule is a recent Office of the Comptroller of the Currency rule designed to identify which party in a partnership between a national bank and a third party is deemed the “true lender.”

Without the rule, these partnerships now face regulatory uncertainty, with legal and compliance requirements potentially determined on a case-by-case basis.

On May 11, 2021, the Senate voted to repeal a Trump Administration regulation that defines which party is the “true lender” in partnerships between banks and non-banks, including financial technology and other non-bank lending companies. The Senate resolution now heads to the House of Representatives, which is expected to pass the resolution. President Biden has signaled his support for the repeal and will likely enact the repeal following a vote in the House. The repeal of this rule could create regulatory uncertainty for fintechs and other non-bank lenders that were relying on the rule.

(Excerpt) Read more at jdsupra.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
I don't have much information on this. It is in the Federal Register on what Trump's Regulations do not allow but the Dems are accusing the regulations of the direct opposite.

OKAY....it's the OCC True Lender Rule which ties into the Federal Bank Laws. The Dems argue about higher interest rates but it does nothing of the sort. That is still the state's responsibility. How can this be Trump's regulations?

(S.J. Res. 15. is the bill.)

1 posted on 06/24/2021 2:01:21 PM PDT by gattaca
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: gattaca

Don’t know anything about this, but it sounds like the sort of thing that was being done in the years leading up to the 2008 financial meltdown.


2 posted on 06/24/2021 2:11:47 PM PDT by Steely Tom ([Voter Fraud] == [Civil War])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

Maybe it’s made it harder for Democrats to steal money from other investors?


3 posted on 06/24/2021 2:15:24 PM PDT by Rurudyne (Standup Philosopher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: gattaca
Biden is all for obfuscation of who the true lender is. You know, Joe's Friendly Neighborhood Mortgage Company is really a Goldman Sachs Hedge Fund, whose employees wouldn't live in your neighborhood in a million years, let alone give a tinker's damn about you personally.

Trump was all for transparency. And cleaning out the swamp.

4 posted on 06/24/2021 2:20:25 PM PDT by Governor Dinwiddie (Damn it, Rush. You left us too soon. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gattaca

The rule Trump put forward clarified the “true lender” so that the bank and its partner could know what parts of the laws and regulations applied to which partner. Repealing the rule appears to reinstate that uncertainty, which will cause the money to not be loaned out as often.

Xiden is simply trying to stad borrowers in the back by obfuscating the meaning of the law.


5 posted on 06/24/2021 2:25:50 PM PDT by MortMan (Shouldn't "palindrome" read the same forward and backward?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MortMan

Xiden is simply trying to stad borrowers in the back by obfuscating the meaning of the law.


Or looking for more lobbyist cash to influence a new rule/law.


6 posted on 06/24/2021 3:11:47 PM PDT by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: gattaca

I don’t know anything about this, but I do know that Byedone won’t be happy until he’s rolled back every single improvement President Trump made! SO evil!


7 posted on 06/24/2021 3:17:20 PM PDT by Flaming Conservative ((Pray without ceasing))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gattaca

This is the big banks wanting something, pretty much the only thing that can get both parties in Congress to jump to action.


8 posted on 06/24/2021 3:21:49 PM PDT by Renfrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gattaca

Know Your Customer rule for banks-good. Know Your Lender rule for banks-bad. Figures.


9 posted on 06/24/2021 7:17:12 PM PDT by Ahithophel (Communication is an art form susceptible to sudden technical failure)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gattaca

The rule made a lot of legal work, and work for lawyers unnecessary, as it provided legal clarity.

Now one of the Dims favorite donor classes - lawyers - will again get work arguing in courts and with regulators which of their parties in a financial relationship is the “true lender” in the relationship, because without the Trump era rule that situation is not clear, it is a gray area in the law.

If there is one thing lawyers hate in the law it is full transparency. Just look at all the legislation they are responsible for, where lack of transparency is the norm, and it provides plenty of wiggle room for the DOJ and regulators to choose who to persecute and why.


10 posted on 06/25/2021 7:47:58 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson