“Anti-Vax movement”? I think you’re giving a good illustration of what this article is about.
I think there are many people who are justifiably skeptical or wary of a months old vaccine that hadn’t or hasn’t been tested through peer reviewed clinical trials for both safety and efficacy, and coupled with that an incessant advertising campaign to take it regardless of age, sex, pregnancy, comorbidities, adding to that with the absence of any mention of herd immunity reached through natural infecfion.
Anyone who beings these issues up are branded “Anti Science”, and with a “guilt by association” type of character association. It doesn’t necessarily follow. The people who are literally screaming “Follow the Science!”, they have no idea what science is. Even St. Fauci, the patron saint of all things Covid-19, declared any criticism of him, is automatically “anti science”; and you wouldn’t want to be “anti science” would you?
I’m gonna call that BS, and this is EXACTLY what is being described in this excellent article.
That raises the question of how do you believe we should get to scientific truth?
The highest level of certainty possible is a peer reviewed, double-blinded, large scale trial. We got that for all of the vaccines.
If you insist on more evidence than that, then you are denying the possibility of scientific truth as no higher level of verification is possible.