Posted on 06/11/2021 3:44:32 AM PDT by Kaslin
The first line of this article is false: “The COVID vaccine is not a vaccine at all.” This is completely wrong, and should tell the reader that the rest of the article is not any better.
—
Actually this is factually correct. The covid vaccine is not an attenuated or dead form of covid. It contains mRNA which commands the human body’s ribosomes to begin constructing spike proteins. The body then senses these spike proteins as a foreign entity provoking an immune response. The immune response then destroys the “infected” cells.
The question is where does the mRNA go? Does it circulate thru the body entering cells other than those at the injection site? Because if it does travel to organs, cells in those organs are going to start building spike protein. These “infected” cells will be killed by the body’s immune response. If this occurs in the lungs, this is doubly bad as the spike protein causes SARS.
No, it is NOT factually correct! I’ve previously posted on this forum journal articles disproving this idiotic statement.
The first line is correct,you are wrong
No, YOU are wrong. An mRNA vaccine is still a vaccine, and is referred to as such in the literature. Just because it does not use a live virus, does not make it a non-vaccine.
The definition of vaccine was NOT changed, and the COVID mRNA vaccines are NOT the first mRNA vaccines to be developed. Repeating the same falsehoods over and over, as you do, makes this site look like it’s inhabited by morons.
Can scientists, other than those employed by a government bureaucrat or Big Pharma, clarify how the COVID-19 inoculations differ from a bio-weapon?
It is NOT a vaccine and doesn’t meet the definition of a vaccine, that is till the CDC changed the definition of what a vaccine actually is, in Aug if last year. Wonder why they felt the need to change a definition after more than 100 years of use?
Almost no one NEEDS the shot for a “disease” which 99.9%+ will survive, with most barely knowing they had it.
I am curious too. Why did they pursue the MRNA way against Covid instead of a traditional vaccine? Thoughts?
What is an IM injection?
It’s also the primary inoculation used in many Latin American nations, hence the severity of the crisis down there. We’ve had family severely impacted by it down there.
There is a current, documented study in Israel looking into the impact of said MRNA inoculations and their impact on the ovarian reserves of women in Israeli society. It started in February and is financed to run for one year. They have bee/are recruiting 200 volunteers who intend to get the shot. Should be interesting to see the results in 2022.
NONSENSE. We had mRNA vaccines in development for at least a decade, and in human trials for multiple diseases such as rabies and Zika. Are you saying that those weren’t vaccines either? You’re nuts, if so—take a look at the literature.
The G7 Meeting is Today...
WE WILL DECIDE WHO LIVES AND WHO DIES AT G7 (EX BRITISH PRIME MINISTER)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/N1fQqMBBt5g8/
(Weird smile when he says “vaccine”.)
It is inhabited by morons... You being one of them. You fail to accept any oppinion except your own. The mRNA gene therapy is NOT and DOES NOT meet the definition of a vaccine that has been the standard for decades and that definition has been changed to cover this.
Your one of the covid cultists sheeple and I find that pathetic. Science.. real science, not CDC and government science will prove you wrong in the long run.
If you took, say, five seconds out of your busy day to look back, you could see that the definition of vaccine has covered mRNA vaccines for a while. Here’s one example from 2015:
https://web.archive.org/web/20150108181434/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaccine
See my post #37, idiot.
Wikipedia is not medical science...
Try a medical science website and look at history before mRNA for what a vaccine definition is or was.
You sound like the AOC of science.
Go ahead and go through my previous posts to find academic journal articles. Even prior to the development of mRNA vaccines a decade ago, there were other types besides live virus. Again, I will go to my Tesla analogy: do you also believe that a Tesla is not a car, because it does not have an internal combustion engine? Technology advances in lockstep with science, and things change.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.