Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Karl Spooner

Good post.

Patients receiving the treatment had significant dose-and time-dependent reduction of amyloid beta plaque, while patients in the control arm of the studies had no reduction of amyloid beta plaque.

Notice the article says nothing about improving the mental state of the patients, or reducing the memory loss. Amyloid beta is not the cause the problem Amyloid beta is the result of the real cause, and is produced by the body to solve the real problem.


36 posted on 06/07/2021 11:34:28 AM PDT by aimhigh (THIS is His commandment . . . . 1 John 3:23)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: aimhigh
Notice the article says nothing about improving the mental state of the patients, or reducing the memory loss. Amyloid beta is not the cause the problem

I think they know that now, too. But at least they get to recoup their research money they wasted on their theory this way. FDA takes care of their own.

37 posted on 06/07/2021 11:39:42 AM PDT by Karl Spooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

To: aimhigh

But the F.D.A. advisory committee, along with an independent think tank and several prominent experts — including some Alzheimer’s doctors who worked on the aducanumab clinical trials — said the evidence raised significant doubts about whether the drug is effective. They also said that even if aducanumab could slow cognitive decline in some patients, the benefit suggested by the evidence would be so slight that it would not outweigh the risk of swelling or bleeding in the brain that the drug caused in the trials.


38 posted on 06/07/2021 11:56:33 AM PDT by Cathi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson