Is SA actually reporting facts instead of the enviro-voodoo and Woke BS it’s been embracing?
This is an article from April last year.
It was meant to be anti-Trump and meant to garner support for funding these studies again and somehow blame Trump for the epidemic.
It was a pushed narrative. LA Times simultaneously printed a similar article.
The SciAm article gave away how much, $200M, was spent. They were trying to say they need even more.