Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Celebrating Pride Month IS Celebrating America’s Destruction
Family Policy Institute of Washington ^ | June 4, 2021 | Mark Miloscia

Posted on 06/04/2021 12:26:51 PM PDT by fwdude

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
To: Trump.Deplorable

16 percent of gen alpha identify as lgbtqia. Thats a significant number.


21 posted on 06/04/2021 1:07:00 PM PDT by momincombatboots (Ephesians 6... who you are really at war with)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jstolzen

The problem with that line is that it is just repeat lies of the gay lobby

The census has gay households at .50% of the population

The census probably has the largest sample size of any study

That is the interesting part of the data

So we have conflict of data here

On one hand when you are asked if you are gay, 4.5% claim they are, from a smaller sample size

On the other if asked by the government if are gay only .5% say they are with a really large sample size, the US Census.

We can slice this any way we want, do we trust the media data at 4.5% or the government data with a super large sample size at .5%?


22 posted on 06/04/2021 1:13:05 PM PDT by Trump.Deplorable
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: momincombatboots
16 percent of gen alpha identify as lgbtqia. Thats a significant number.

Based on personal experience (especially lately), I'd totally believe that to be within range of being reasonably accurate..

23 posted on 06/04/2021 1:13:53 PM PDT by jstolzen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: momincombatboots

16 percent of gen alpha identify as lgbtqia. Thats a significant number.


No it is not

Still insignificant

Look at it this way, 16% of a really small population of a really small sample size means nothing.

.5% of a country wide census with a huge sample size is meaningful

You can either pick the US Census or the media polls, I tend to look at the US census since the sample size is way larger then whatever crap the media polls do


24 posted on 06/04/2021 1:15:47 PM PDT by Trump.Deplorable
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Trump.Deplorable
I think your article (good read, by the way) is a little ambiguous, but if you dig down a little deeper, they are talking about gay households in their percentages, not the number of homosexually-identifying people.
25 posted on 06/04/2021 1:16:59 PM PDT by fwdude (“I do think at a certain point you've paid enough taxes.” — Not Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: fwdude
Why is much of Corporate America choosing to openly celebrate, destructive sin, and support the organizations who will destroy our country?

Now that the godless Marxists control the government and culture, Corporate America knows if they do not fall in line and worship LBGTQ, they will be utterly destroyed... endless prosecutions, new regulations, cancel culture.

26 posted on 06/04/2021 1:18:07 PM PDT by Dan in Wichita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

That is how the US Census works


27 posted on 06/04/2021 1:19:37 PM PDT by Trump.Deplorable
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Trump.Deplorable
That is how the US Census works

Then that does not purport to describe the percentage of the population who identify (another problematic term) as "gay."

Few homosexuals partner up in a household, and even fewer of those register as "married." So the number of homosexual households is a small subset of the number of people who "identify" as homosexual, lesbian, bi-sexual or "transgender" on the Census. I'm sure this number has to be somewhere in the report, but it is not the same as the number of households. I hope that makes sense.

28 posted on 06/04/2021 1:24:22 PM PDT by fwdude (“I do think at a certain point you've paid enough taxes.” — Not Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

Proverbs 16:18 “Pride goes before destruction, a haughty spirit before a fall”


29 posted on 06/04/2021 1:24:31 PM PDT by P.O.E. (Pray for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P.O.E.

Indeed. And they’re so blind to that Proverb.


30 posted on 06/04/2021 1:26:53 PM PDT by fwdude (“I do think at a certain point you've paid enough taxes.” — Not Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Pilated

I proudly have pink white Anglo Saxon month every month of the year. I also don’t mind if other patriots with different colours of skin than I join as well, so long as they’re patriots. I’ve never actually heard a Sikh talk about it, the ones I know are pretty chill.

I’m not ashamed to say I’m white and proud of it lol.

It’s not like it matters, I had no say in the decision.


31 posted on 06/04/2021 1:29:31 PM PDT by Bulwyf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

“I’ve read from reliable sources that a key long-term strategy by homos has been to get into the human resources and advertising departments of large businesses to push this insanity, often without the direct knowledge of the officers.”

The plan has been to infiltrate every profession that plays a role in influencing public opinion, so that’s pretty much every profession - especially journalism, teaching, political science, social science, law, librarianship, psychiatry, psychology, social work, clergy, human resources management. Then they moved to the hard sciences, medicine, nursing, etc,


32 posted on 06/04/2021 1:32:01 PM PDT by Seeing More Clearly Now
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Seeing More Clearly Now

But if they can target the HR departments, they can get their hiring edicts implemented more readily, which filters down to the other areas by “tolerance training.” And the large corporations set the pace for everyone else.


33 posted on 06/04/2021 1:40:51 PM PDT by fwdude (“I do think at a certain point you've paid enough taxes.” — Not Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

Accosted by the term “Pride Month,” and “Gay Pride,” one really should respond, “This is not something to be proud of - no way, no how.” “Keep your private behavior private, like the rest of the world.” “No one is under any obligation to applaud your behavior.”


34 posted on 06/04/2021 1:44:41 PM PDT by Seeing More Clearly Now
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seeing More Clearly Now

Hulu is throwing this “pride” crap in my face. Since I rarely use it anymore, I’m going to use this as an opportunity to tell them to shove my subscription where the fags like it. Gonna be fun.


35 posted on 06/04/2021 1:52:23 PM PDT by fwdude (“I do think at a certain point you've paid enough taxes.” — Not Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

It just shows how insignificant they really are. The census is the ultimate survey. .5% of households identify as gay.

Household can be one person, two people, a family or a bunch of people living together.

.5% of the households identify as gay is insignificant.

Just because some purple haired he/she freak living in mom’s basement, who will probably change its identity a dozen times over the next 4 years, is not counted as “gay” in the census is a good thing, they are insignificant in the scheme of things and honestly really don’t matter. They would be unreliable, fickle and change their “sexuality” a few dozen times to fit in with whatever is popular in the media at that moment. Census should not be following pop trends but in absolutes. Census should be about real numbers, what is real in the country, not fickle people play acting whatever is popular or trendy at the moment.

.5% of American households identify as gay, they are insignificant. The rest who identify as “gay” and are not counted as “gay” are even less insignificant, they are losers who are play acting for attention on twitter or wherever, do you really want policy set towards that type of transient population? And it begs the question, why do 99.5% of American households have to cow tow to this insignificant group? Why does 99.5% of American households need to be reminded about the .5% every single day? Seen on TV shows, commercials, government publications, etc. Seems like that .5% is over represented.


36 posted on 06/04/2021 1:53:02 PM PDT by Trump.Deplorable
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

“But if they can target the HR departments, they can get their hiring edicts implemented more readily, which filters down to the other areas by “tolerance training.” And the large corporations set the pace for everyone else”

Yes, HR guides the process and trains staff on how to think, themselves having undergone training in government and industry and more and more the private sector. Management is afraid not to be politically correct and afraid of candidates filing a civil rights complaint if they don’t get the job or academic opening. Numeric goals are used, formally or informally. Ditto for the hiring of Blacks, Hispanics, women, derived from EOMO regulations. In professional organizations, the members are brainwashed into going out of their way to choose those who proclaim themselves homosexual and to support whatever they want within the organization.


37 posted on 06/04/2021 1:54:12 PM PDT by Seeing More Clearly Now
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Trump.Deplorable

I’ll find the actually Census number and provide you with that later. This article of yours takes a lot of liberties, and provides NO citations. Not the hallmark of a reliable source.


38 posted on 06/04/2021 1:55:34 PM PDT by fwdude (“I do think at a certain point you've paid enough taxes.” — Not Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: fwdude; All
Why is much of Corporate America choosing to openly celebrate, destructive sin, and support the organizations who will destroy our country?
Infiltrate and gain control of big business.

— Communist goal #37
Sadly, the answer comes too easily.
39 posted on 06/04/2021 1:55:56 PM PDT by Olog-hai ("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trump.Deplorable

“The decennial survey won’t inquire about individuals’ sexual orientation and gender identity, but it will count cohabiting same-sex couples for the first time.”

https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/2020-census-what-lgbtq-americans-should-know-n1167656

So, no, the Census did NOT ask everyone about how they identify sexually.


40 posted on 06/04/2021 1:59:33 PM PDT by fwdude (“I do think at a certain point you've paid enough taxes.” — Not Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson