They're violating Section 230 and have become a content provider instead of a service provider. They're also guilty of illegal campaign contributions-in-kind. They need to be charged, fined, and stripped of their Section 230 liability waiver.
They’re violating Section 230 and have become a content provider instead of a service provider. They’re also guilty of illegal campaign contributions-in-kind. They need to be charged, fined, and stripped of their Section 230 liability waiver.
Not like Congress is any hurry to do that :-(