I don’t want to say she wasn’t a victim in all of this. She was. She was, however, also an abuser herself by using “her position as an employee and politician to coerce her staffers into an intimate relationship with her. There can be more than one villain in a situation in real life. Her coercion of staff was the story the news covered, and that was the reason she isn’t a congresswoman today. The Nazi tattoo would have been the story if she were a republican, but she coerced staff into sex, and she wasn’t smart enough to lean into it like other politicians.”
This response is the most valid of all posts so far. Yes, she is not a woman of Virtue. Yes, she is not a hottie. That said, publishing nude pics of her without her knowledge or consent should be punishable under law. The fact that a judge doesn’t get this is simply a further indication of just how broken our legal system truly is. Making her pay for suing for unauthorized publishing of nude photos and legal fees backs up the fact our legal system is corrupt as hell and not a legal system at all. It is a political retribution system whereby the “morals” and political beliefs of the judges dictate their rulings and NOT Law.
My opnion is not in support of this woman. It is a statement of the lawless, corrupt condition of too many people in our “legal system”. A corrupt state of affairs that does not bode well for us as a society or a country.
This is one awesome post.
To ocrp1982
Read post 16, and then reconsider what you wrote.
BTW - what is Bibicly? Is it about Benjamin Netanyahu? Or some odd typo?
I agree. Don’t have a kind thing to say about Hill, however this is a bad ruling. Would not be surprised if it is appealed and overturned quickly.
Your statement is excellent!!!
I wish FR had a like button
“Yes, she is not a hottie.”
Hey ORCP-I’m sure you wood. She’s pleasingly plump. If all women made themselves available like that they’re d be a lot of happier fellas out there even freepers.