Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Larger Than Expected Crude Draw Fuels Oil Price Rally
Oil Price ^ | 6/2/2021 | Julianne Geiger

Posted on 06/02/2021 2:36:15 PM PDT by SaxxonWoods

The American Petroleum Institute (API) on Tuesday reported a draw in crude oil inventories of 5.36-million barrels for the week ending May 28.

Analysts had predicted a draw of 2.114 million barrels for the week.

In the previous week, the API reported a draw in oil inventories of 439,000 barrels after analysts had predicted a draw of 1.050 million barrels. Since the start of 2020, crude oil inventories have grown by more than 46 million barrels, according to API data. ---- Oil prices were trading up on Wednesday afternoon, on bullish signals from OPEC that saw the group stick to its output plans for the coming month. The bullish OPEC news, combined with a lack of new developments regarding the Iran/U.S. nuclear deal, saw prices climb by more than 1% by noon. At 12:32 p.m. EST, WTI was trading up $0.89 (+1.31%) at $68.61 prior to the data release—up $2.50 per barrel at that time. Brent crude was trading up $0.87 per barrel (+1.24%) at $71.12 per barrel.

(Excerpt) Read more at oilprice.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: energy; oil
Oil at $69. The latest increase hasn't hit the pumps yet. The howling will begin in earnest when it does.

But how many even remember this:

Between Jan, 2010 and Dec, 2014 oil stayed in a range between $80 and $115 a barrel. 4 years.

And people think today's price is high? Oh, this is going to to be fun to watch if the current predictions are correct.

1 posted on 06/02/2021 2:36:15 PM PDT by SaxxonWoods
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SaxxonWoods

Maybe people are driving less and consequently more oil supply?


2 posted on 06/02/2021 2:44:07 PM PDT by HighSierra5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HighSierra5

“Maybe people are driving less and consequently more oil supply?”

That was true last year. This year we are driving more again and flying a lot more again, and OPEC has held the line on production. Biden is hampering production in the US. This is true worldwide as well. OPEC likes prices close to $100, they need those prices to pay out their welfare states.

We may go back to those 2010-2014 prices.


3 posted on 06/02/2021 2:49:56 PM PDT by SaxxonWoods (Any comment might be sarcasm, or not. It depends. Often I'm not sure either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SaxxonWoods

(API) on Tuesday reported a draw in crude oil inventories of 5.36-million barrels for the week ending May 28.

Analysts had predicted a draw of 2.114 million barrels for the week.

....same analysts that predicted the just employment numbers?


4 posted on 06/02/2021 2:54:52 PM PDT by Rusty0604 (" When you can't make them see the light, make them feel the heat." -Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SaxxonWoods

CNBC chimes in:

“Demand is ramping up very quickly because everybody’s driving, and we have the reopening of Europe, which is really starting to happen,” said Francisco Blanch, global commodities and derivatives strategist at Bank of America. “India seems to have hit an inflection point, in terms of cases, which in my mind could mean you also get a return of mobility.”


5 posted on 06/02/2021 2:55:35 PM PDT by SaxxonWoods (Any comment might be sarcasm, or not. It depends. Often I'm not sure either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SaxxonWoods
Between Jan, 2010 and Dec, 2014 oil stayed in a range between $80 and $115 a barrel. 4 years.

Thanks, Barack!

6 posted on 06/02/2021 3:03:25 PM PDT by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

“....same analysts that predicted the just employment numbers?”

Not at all. Unexpected short term bumps up and down happen, but looking at the pattern, which is the world is reopening, much more flying, driving and ships running, economies rebuilding the lost production, it all says supply will be under pressure, demand is going up fast worldwide.

My point was that people were having a fit when oil hit gas hit $3.00. Where were they between 2010 and 2015 when it was $3.60-$4.20 a gallon for 4 years straight? Meanwhile Biden keeps hampering supply. The fun may only be beginning.


7 posted on 06/02/2021 3:03:29 PM PDT by SaxxonWoods (Any comment might be sarcasm, or not. It depends. Often I'm not sure either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 17th Miss Regt

Yep, and Biden (Obama’s 3rd term) is just getting started. Obama himself says the same thing. And there’s no shale revolution to happen this time. Yes, production will rise, but not like those days.


8 posted on 06/02/2021 3:05:46 PM PDT by SaxxonWoods (Any comment might be sarcasm, or not. It depends. Often I'm not sure either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SaxxonWoods

July 2008 oil was over $147.00 per barrel.


9 posted on 06/02/2021 3:10:40 PM PDT by Meatspace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Meatspace

July 2008 oil was over $147.00 per barrel.

Yes that was the modern peak. IIRC, it went to $27 a barrel very soon after.


10 posted on 06/02/2021 3:37:17 PM PDT by SaxxonWoods (Any comment might be sarcasm, or not. It depends. Often I'm not sure either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SaxxonWoods

The analysts couldn’t have seen that? That was my point.


11 posted on 06/02/2021 3:37:40 PM PDT by Rusty0604 (" When you can't make them see the light, make them feel the heat." -Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SaxxonWoods

Iranian oil depot fire has nothing to do with it.
Green New Deal has nothing to do with it.
Pipeline cancelation has nothing to do with it.
I Know! Evil Capitalists!


12 posted on 06/02/2021 3:42:03 PM PDT by outofsalt (If history teaches us anything, it's that history rarely teaches anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SaxxonWoods

Bfl


13 posted on 06/02/2021 5:08:35 PM PDT by sauropod (Chance favors the prepared mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SaxxonWoods

After in recent months crude oil prices have clearly recovered from their COVID-19 slump on steadily increasing demand, Russian Deputy Prime Minister Alexander Novak addressed the much anticipated decision-making at the upcoming OPEC+ conference set for August and the expectation that it will decide to raise output significantly beyond the current pandemic-induced strategy of gradually releasing more barrels into a strengthening oil market.

Novak confirmed the upcoming OPEC+ conference will address and finalize oil output for August and other months, while stressing that oil prices shooting too high “may force users to switch to other energy sources.”

On that front in particular, he blasted current IEA proposals and a “road map” being pushed which in the end could lead to $200 a barrel oil(!):

If the world were to follow the International Energy Agency’s controversial road map, which said investment in new fields would have to stop immediately to achieve net-zero carbon emissions by 2050, “the price for oil will go to, what, $200? Gas prices will skyrocket,” Novak said.

And naturally Qatar and Saudi Arabia seconded that dire assessment, vowing to continue expanding their oil and gas facilities while pointing the finger at the climate activists for seeking to starve industry cash. Bloomberg presents the Gulf statements Thursday as follows:

The “euphoria” around the transition to clean energy is “dangerous,” Qatar’s Energy Minister Saad Sherida Al Kaabi said at the St Petersburg International Economic Forum in Russia on Thursday.

“When you deprive the business from additional investments, you have big spikes” in prices, he stressed further.

As a reminder, IEA’s roadmap set out in the Paris Accords for achieving net zero carbon emissions by 2050 requires reducing emissions as much as possible then offsetting the rest with “carbon removal” plans financed by carbon credits.

Source: IEA

However as we’ve detailed before, with economists expecting global growth to expand at even faster rates thanks to the infusion of stimulus inspired by the pandemic, it follows that energy demand will also increase more quickly. Despite this, many economists and scientists expect that improvements in energy efficiency and the shift to renewables means that global energy demand will be around 8% smaller than it is today in 2050, even though the global economy will be more than twice as large as it is today.

With this in mind, it was perhaps the recent Saudi comments from St. Petersburg which put it best, dismissing the “la-la-land” scenario in an earlier statement...

“Saudi Energy Minister Prince Abdulaziz bin Salman has already dismissed the IEA road map, which would limit the average increase in global temperatures to 1.5 Celsius, calling it a la-la-land scenario,” he said according to Bloomberg. “When asked on Thursday if oil is dead, he responded by saying the kingdom is increasing its production capacity.”

https://www.zerohedge.com/energy/well-see-200-oil-russia-opec-ministers-blast-ieas-net-zero-2050-plan-la-la-land


14 posted on 06/03/2021 8:31:59 AM PDT by Rusty0604 (" When you can't make them see the light, make them feel the heat." -Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson