Posted on 06/01/2021 4:23:39 AM PDT by Enlightened1
Prime Minister Boris Johnson says he wants the G7 group of nations to agree on a plan that would see everyone around the world vaccinated against Covid-19 by the end of 2022.
In an interview with CBC News in Canada, Johnson also called for a “global treaty on pandemic preparedness” at next month’s meeting, which will be hosted in the UK.
The British leader said the G7 nations should consider so-called vaccine passports and COVID-status certification at their meeting, which Johnson sees as playing a great role in reopening international travel.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tls5WXcGE0U
“The mice developed strong immune response, warranting further study in humans. “
You didn’t read it, and you haven’t read all the other studies that Bill Gates paid for. ALL the animals died. He even said so.
At E13, animals were euthanized and maternal spleen (E), maternal brain (F), placenta (G), and fetal heads (H) were harvested and analyzed for levels of ZIKV RNA.
You may announce proudly that you suffered no physical ill effects from the experimental gene therapy of your choice, but not so with a mental effect. The experimental injection has clearly made you short-tempered ... even a bit nasty in your responses to people who disagree with you. Behave yourself. No need to fear ... you'll likely be one of the fortunate injection recipients. and survive the Moderna experimental injection just fine.
My apologies—I do get short-tempered when presented with abject stupidity, which is rife on FR nowadays. Yes, I consider folks whom are antivaxxers to be the same as Flat Earthers—they’re wrong, but you can’t convince them.
If you don’t believe in taking vaccines, don’t. If you want to get vaccines, then get them. It’s that simple. Nobody put a gun to your head to make you take anything.
You still haven’t come to the proper conclusion. Non-doctorates usually go for single sentences to support their illogical claims. You just did that. There is a much more important sentence in that paper. You missed it, and the entire point and outcome of the study.
This is why I usually hate discussing things with non-docs. I have to stop and give you an education to even have a discussion because things you say are usually at a retarded level. Reading comprehension is severely lacking in your type, but you often think you are being clever. You are unable to see the big picture even when it has been presented in words to you. It is why colors and different fonts are not used in research papers; just say it in black in white with the least amount of words so as to not be confusing. Yet, here you are, unpracticed in reading, missing the entire point of a clearly written research paper.
No vaccine has been jabbed into 100% of the world so why this particular one? Huh?
I understand the paper perfectly, thank you—I’m certain you don’t, if you continue with your claim that mRNA vaccines have never been tested in animals with any success. Again, your claim that 100% of animals in experiments died from the vaccines is patently false.
They’re doing it where I work. They’re issuing special badges to those who have been vaccinated. The rest are expected to wear masks.
I’m working from home. If they try to change that, I’m out.
Having travelled on business throughout the world I've had many shots without any ill effects and without any personal concerns. I just don't think I need this one as I haven't had so much as a head cold since 2000, and I take lots of supplements including Quercitin with zinc since the beginning of this world-wide debacle. As to the truly evil practice of demanding healthy people wear a mask ......... well, that's a subject for another emotionally charged thread. Cheers!
Sorry, but the mRNA vaccines *are* vaccines, and are referenced as such in the literature. As for taking the Pfizer or Moderna vaccines, that’s a personal choice like any other medical decision. I have stated repeatedly that everyone should choose for himself. What I object to is the hysterical, paranoid claims about the vaccination campaigns.
Roughly one in three SARS-cov-2 survivors are experiencing long term effects from being infected with SARS-cov-2, including cognitive issues. Side effects cut across age demographics also, so its not just older folks experiencing these side effects.
Survive getting infected with Covid and there's a 30% chance you're gonna experience some long term problems.
Folks gambling their immune system can beat a deadly laboratory engineered coronavirus should really study the odds of getting infected carefully before making that decision.
UK - bump for later...
Go pound sand you Limey globalist cretin.
....with the majority who contract having NO lasting side effects....
~~~~
Roughly one in three SARS-cov-2 survivors are experiencing long term effects from being infected with SARS-cov-2, including cognitive issues. Side effects cut across age demographics also, so its not just older folks experiencing these side effects.
Survive getting infected with Covid and there’s a 30% chance you’re gonna experience some long term problems.
1 in 3.....so.....2 out of 3 (majority) aren’t experiencing long term side effects.
30% are....and....70% (as I said...majority) are not.
And, what % of those who are in this minority of having long term side effects were given SAFE, EFFECTIVE and EARLY treatment with either HCQ or Ivermectin, along with zinc?
Speaking of cognitive issues....that plus MULTIPLE OTHER issues are happening with these experimental shots.
######
Folks gambling their immune system can beat a deadly laboratory engineered coronavirus should really study the odds of getting infected carefully before making that decision.
Who’s gambling? The ones taking Vitamin C and Vitamin D, along with other known preventatives such as Quercetin, HCQ and/or Ivermectin?
Wow.....huge gamble, there. Not.
We have family members who’ve been doing just that (supplements/preventatives), for a year, now. and have not contracted the china virus. They’ve continued working, dining, shopping, etc., throughout this time.
And, they’re NOT willing to gamble with these experimental shots....that, each day that goes by, are proving to have long term (or, short....if you consider death) adverse side effects.
What I object to is the hysterical, paranoid claims about the vaccination campaigns.
About, or BY, the vax campaigns?
Sorry, when politicians are openly campaigning to make us carry “papers” to show we’ve been vaccinated against a virus that is no threat to the majority of the population, then it’s no longer paranoid to question vaccines.
when politicians are openly campaigning to make us carry “papers” to show we’ve been vaccinated against a virus that is no threat to the majority of the population, then it’s no longer paranoid to question vaccines.
Agree.
Something as *effective* as they are claiming, against a virus that - as you said - is 99% survivable, should NOT require these sickening, non-stop, 24/7 marketing campaigns....NOR, world leaders calling for WORLDWIDE “vax”ination.
We’ve had to carry vaccination records for travel for decades...it’s not new. As for the coronavirus, I’d rather take my chances with Moderna than with the laboratory-engineered Chinese bioweapon, thanks.
“Nobody is forcing you to take it.”
Yet.
“We’ve had to carry vaccination records for travel for decades...it’s not new.”
Wrong. We’ve never had to carry vaccination record for INTERNAL travel within the borders of our own countries, like the UK has implemented, and like Johnson is advocating for ALL countries to implement.
“laboratory-engineered Chinese bioweapon”
Ooh, who’s spreading “paranoid schizophrenic” talk now?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.