So employers can require a vaccine. But can they require inoculation of something that isn’t a vaccine?
————
Employers can demand just about anything. And there is not anything you can do about it except quit or get fired. Funny, the same crowd herd that cries for “at-will employment” are many of the same folks that say employers can’t require anything.
It’s one or the other, folks. Can’t pick and choose what you like.
My point is that the article seems to use the term “vaccination” loosely. I’m no linguist, but I suspect inoculation with one of these mRNA treatments (which are not vaccines) would not qualify as “vaccination.”
If my employer required that I travel to a tropical country and as part of that, get some vaccinations for tropical diseases, I’d have no problem if they were FDA approved.
So...employers can demand you have a certain skin color, practice a certain religion, have a certain sexual orientation, etc.
A korporation doesn't have the right to force employees to take an experimental treatment as a condition of employment. Forcing experimental treatment on individuals was specifically addressed in the permissible experiments section of the Nuremberg Code in 1947. (http://www.cirp.org/library/ethics/nuremberg/)
Whether korporations like it or not, there are rules. If they want to break them, so can anyone else. One could sell products using the korporation's copyright or trademark without their permission on tables right in front of their business. One could redirect web traffic away from their internet sites. One could park their vehicles blocking their driveways. If korporations don't like the rules, they can go somewhere else and not connect to our municipal utilities, roadways, and electrical grid, they could be thrown out of the same courts of laws they violate.
“Employers can demand just about anything.”
And if an employer’s demand causes injury or death, damn right the employer can be sued. And I’m sure a creative prosecutor can charge the owner with criminal negligence.