[rxsid]

Employers mandating employee's to take an unlicensed and unapproved medication of any kind, how can that even remotely be considered constitutional?

Imagine the precedent this would set.

[cockroach_magoo]

Yes, this seems to set an interesting precedent... envision a future in which employers require workers to take cocaine injections to assist with their productivity. Why not?

Employers will have free reign to do what they want to their employees. What side of Marxism is Joltin Joe on, anyway?

[thecodont]

Employers mandating employee's to take an unlicensed and unapproved medication of any kind, how can that even remotely be considered constitutional?

I wonder if some of those employers are more afraid of being held liable for death and disability from spread of COVID-19 (by not mandating the "vaccinations") to employees AND CUSTOMERS than they are from death and disability as a result of the "vaccinations" to the EMPLOYEES alone.

Is there a "hold harmless" clause for employers forcing the "vaccines" on their employees?

Is VAERS being edited to hide the damage from the "vaccines"? If they could cook the election results, they could do the same with VAERS.