Skip to comments.
Farmer sues over being forced to choose between farming or his constitutional rights
Pacific Legal Foundation ^
| MAY 05, 2021
Posted on 05/29/2021 2:46:41 PM PDT by george76
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-26 last
To: george76
21
posted on
05/29/2021 7:00:27 PM PDT
by
sauropod
(Chance favors the prepared mind.)
To: george76
All these agencies with names that are supposedly to promote things beut only exist to empower bureaucrat tyrants. Who has the Dept of Education educated? What energy has the Dept. of Energy produced?
22
posted on
05/29/2021 7:10:08 PM PDT
by
Organic Panic
(Democrats. Memories as short as Joe Biden's eyes.)
To: george76
I have a big mud puddle on my property from all the rain. If I promise not to farm in my puddle or the surrounding useless mud, can it be protected by federal law as a wetland? Or is the gov not interested in those who don’t want to farm around their puddles?
Should I notify the Dept of Agriculture that I have a puddle? If I do, can I get federal crop insurance for my tomato plants? (They are in buckets, NOT in the puddle.) I want to do the right thing!
23
posted on
05/29/2021 8:19:53 PM PDT
by
CatDancer
(President Trump will remain the President in Exile)
To: george76
In 2011, a division of the Department of Agriculture ruled that a small seasonal mud puddle on Arlen Foster’s farm is protected by federal law as a wetland. This poor guy has been dealing with this for the last 10 years. If he would've shot the first bureaucrat to trespass on his property......he probably could've worked a plea deal to have
#1 been out of prison by now
#2 expedited things to have spent less in lawyer fees
#3 probably discouraged anyone else from lurking around the property.......
24
posted on
05/30/2021 5:42:50 AM PDT
by
Repeat Offender
(While the wicked stand confounded, call me with Thy saints surrounded.)
To: ProtectOurFreedom
After years of litigation, the Sacketts gave up and left the area. Unfortunately, Sackett was convicted of trying to procure a 12 year old girl for sex, was prosecuted, and convicted in North Dakota. Pretty convenient for the Federal government, no?
25
posted on
06/01/2021 7:52:23 AM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(I feel like it is 1937 Germany, and my last name is Feinberg.)
To: Lazamataz
It was a bizarre twist, but there are no coincidences.
26
posted on
06/01/2021 9:20:14 AM PDT
by
ProtectOurFreedom
(“No man’s life, liberty or property are safe while the Legislature is in session" - Gideon J. Tucke)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-26 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson