What convoluted nonsense!
The new law is about having to threaten a company to get them to honor the First Amendment.
Free speech is about letting people say what they think without "big brother" censoring them. Then the intended recipient of the news can decide whether to turn off the radio or tv.
I do not like the idea of big tech deciding what I may or may not hear or read.
The lawsuit is good. Only those that believe the 1st Amendment pertains to private business thinks it's a bad lawsuit. The 1st Amendment ONLY APPLIES to GOVERNMENT restricting freedom of speech, as this law may do. As a private business, you are free to restrict speech nearly as much as you want.
As someone else point out, however, the lawsuit does mention restricting the editorializing capabilities of private business. That's fine. I can accept that. Part of that, however, is that they have revealed themselves as publishers in doing so, and they must be stripped of their protections as a simple "platform".