Given Their Fear of Guns, How Have Professors Ever Gone Off Campus?

For decades, gun control advocates constantly claim that Right-to-Carry laws would lead to disaster. But when disasters don’t occur they move on to the next prediction of disaster. We have to keep track of these predictions if only to judge how much weight to give to their erroneous predictions.

Montana is the latest state to let people carry concealed handguns on college campuses, and the state Board of Regents for the university system demanded an emergency stay from the state Supreme Court because “serious harm is threatened” if the law goes into effect on June 1. The Regents took a real gamble in using such apocalyptic language because the state Supreme Court didn’t grant them their stay. After the law goes into effect and there are none of their predicted problems, what happens to their case?

One wonders if left-leaning professors and college students in a state like Montana feel safe going off campus. Whether they go to a restaurant, movie theater, or grocery store, they are very likely to find themselves next to someone who is legally carrying a gun.

But seven percent of Montanans already possess concealed handgun permits, and students and faculty somehow manage to leave campus.

Gun control advocates don’t understand that criminals seek out targets where victims can’t defend themselves — that gun-free zones make targets more attractive to criminals. It is no accident that 94% of mass public shootings occur where victims are disarmed.

Montanans were supposed to be able to carry concealed handguns at college campuses starting June 1, but Montana’s Board of Regents filed a legal challenge with the state Supreme Court to the new law last Thursday.

Faculty and staff worry that students who are angry about grades might shoot professors. The academic community, they argue, will be afraid to openly discuss issues for fear of harm. So it will be difficult to hire faculty, and students will be scared away.

The new law “targets our Montana University System students, and public education itself . . . This will not only kill students, but also the future of public education in Montana,” wrote University of Montana professor Doug Coffin. “Residence halls are incredibly dense living spaces, and by their nature they are an incredibly dangerous place for the possession of firearms,” asserted Lindy Kolb, an MSU student.

Eleven other states mandate that concealed handgun permit holders must be allowed to carry on public college campuses. Twenty-three other states leave the decision up to individual colleges.

Professors in state after state have predicted that these laws will be disastrous. In 2015, Dan Hamermesh, an emeritus professor at the University of Texas, was quoted in international news stories after speculating, “a disgruntled student might bring a gun into the classroom and start shooting at me has been substantially enhanced by the concealed-carry law.” According to the University of Texas at Austin’s “Campus Carry Policy Working Group,” people thought it would “impede the University’s ability to recruit and retain students, faculty, and staff.”

But no permit holder has ever shot a faculty member. Among campuses that allow concealed carry, not one has ever experienced a violent shooting by someone who was legally carrying. There have been a few accidental discharges, but none were life-threatening.

Permit holders have been extremely law-abiding, with permits being revoked for firearms-related violations at rates of thousandths or tens-of-thousandths of one percentage point. Civilian permit holders are convicted of firearms violations at one-seventh the rate of police officers.

Texas’ public universities started allowing concealed carry in 2016, and enrollment has risen every year from the fall of 2015 to the fall of 2019 (up by a total of 6% at four-year universities) %), and SAT scores rose by 7%. You will search in vain for any stories from the last few years of faculty leaving because of campus carry policies.

In a filing with the Montana Supreme Court, the Board of Regents argue that Montana’s 1972 constitutional convention vested it with the “full power, responsibility, and authority” to manage the Montana University System. But this “full power” comes with limitations. Obviously, the Regents can’t decide to hold criminal trials without juries or execute people for speech it doesn’t like. Both the Montana and Federal constitutions protect the rights to speech and jury trials, and they also protect people’s right to self-defense.

If liberal academics really believed their claims about guns, they would have left states like Montana or Texas or any of the other right-to-carry states long ago. The most ardent gun-control advocate would never put “Gun-Free Zone” signs on their home, so let’s stop putting them elsewhere.

The anti-gun goons have used the same lies for decades now, and for the same reason that they started. Their base, unthinking progressives and the last of the remaining old-style liberals liked feeling superior to their Neanderthal, gun-toting family and neighbors. As well, the urban dwellers who had lost the connection with the land that their more sensible forebears had, simply saw only the criminal misuse of firearms, and none of the benefits. But the gun-grabbers never really cared about crime, or public order, and certainly not liberty. Their aim has always been to disarm the law-abiding, not the criminals. They just know that they can't say that and advance their agenda. At this point, there is simply no need to credit their arguments with the presumption of good faith. They have none. They should be called out as the liars and would-be despots that they are at every available opportunity.

Faculty and staff worry that students who are angry about grades might shoot professors.

Two thoughts. First, get over yourselves. You are simply just not that important in students' lives. Most of them won't even remember most of you after the term is over, regardless of grades. I've taken a lot of classes, a lot (3 degrees). There are only two professors I distinctly remember - both fondly. Yes I generally did very well in school, but yes I did end up repeating a couple of classes that I struggled with. Yes, *I* struggled with. Not the professors' fault I didn't put the effort in the first time through.

Second, maybe if kids, teenagers, young adults were taught how to both win and lose gracefully, to accept criticism, to reason things out and put them in perspective there would be no basis to fear their reactions. Of course that runs counter to what the left wants and needs. They need people to react emotionally and to act-out without thinking. That way they are so much easier to manipulate and control.

‘Twas in another lifetime, but my girlfriend and I went to a campus sponsored speech by Hunter S. Thompson some years ago at a Montana university and right at the beginning he pulled put a large revolver and put it on the podium. Nobody blinked.

Maybe a Peacemaker, can’t recall. Another buddy of mine who attended the university carried concealed to class and on campus routinely. He also reloaded cartridges with a real nice RCBS setup in his dorm room.

So I’m wondering what changed? Was it illegal then, or is it already legal now, or just what they are on about.

What the article doesn’t tell the reader is the Montana Supreme Court would not hear the case. They sent it back to the District Court in Helena first. This will not make it through the courts. These leftist commies on the Board of Regents cannot override the legislature and their constitutional mandate.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.