Cashill early analyzed this.
His is the most credible for a number of reasons. Proximity and travel expense included.
This is an old battle, but we did fight it out here. The media buried it in the noise. They are expert at doing that.
Regardless of which, Canada or Kenya, the point is the same-and anyone that glosses it over by accepting blindly that Barack Obama was constitutionally a valid choice for President in the absence of any proof (which a birth certificate would have done, and a requirement for a valid birth certificate would do in the future) is doing the work to pave the way for someone like Kamala Harris to step right in, who is clearly not valid.
And we all know what a Republic, which is defined as the Rule of Law, not the rule of people, becomes when the laws that define it are openly meaningless and commonly disregarded.
The Republic becomes a Banana Republic.
As I said, this discussion is not going to overturn anything, but the recognition of the point as a valid point is exactly the same as recognizing that there were illegal activities in the last election in 2020. What we find is not going to overturn that, and anyone who thinks it will is a fool.
But that doesn’t make the discussion of it a waste of time.