[Kevmo]

You’re simply lying.

I’m not arguing against Berg. I’m arguing that he brought up a legitimate constitutional question. As well as at least half a dozen other lawsuits on Certifigate. The evidence deserved its day in court so that lying scumbag disinformation operatives like you would have a sock in their mouths.

Instead we have a SCOTUS saying that no one in America has “standing”, not even competing candidates like Clinton or Alan West.

[palmer]

The legitimate questions are whether Obama is natural born, whether his mother gave up her and his citizenship, whether that was reinstated. Those are useful legal questions that should have been adjudicated.

"Expert" analysis of forgery can be dismissed by simply pointing out the that documents were sent from Hawaii. That makes that "evidence" useless in court. It doesn't create standing. Not sure why you are blaming me for that excuse used by the courts.