Will you admit that the vaccines are gene therapy?
And since you know so much: what are the nucleoside analogs used in the Pfizer modified RNA?
Some of those nucleosides are toxic, right?
I can admit to anything, but it does not make it the truth. It appears you need to so desperately believe that mRNA is gene therapy to disseminate fear and hope that people will follow your highest level of heresy — learned lies. The mRNA codes for a specific protein (as all mRNA does) and then antibodies develop to this foreign protein. It is that simple and elegant. It does not manipulate the human genome. By analogy, if you are afraid of genetic modification, I assume you will never go out into the sunshine as radiation causes genetic disruption. Ergo you must then stipulate that sunshine and various forms of naturally occurring radiation are gene therapy. Incidentally, these vaccines have been under development since the onset of SARS in about 2011 or so.
Nucleoside analogs — generally are thought to be used in treatements. According to molecules 2021, 26, 986 and following, a thorough description of nucleoside analogs demonstrate how these analogs are incorporated into the genetic replication of (+) SS RNA virus in order to effect chain termination and subsequent replication and transcription of the viral geneome. They are both purine and pyrimidine analogues that are used to terminate chain and block replication. There are widely investigated for therapeutics. By the way, remdesivir is one such drug
In terms of vaccination nucleoside analogues, According to Immunity 2020, Oct 12 ; 53(4) 724 - 732 e7 There was nucleoside modification for introduction to the cell, and three modifications were studied to create the antigenicity of the protein, NOT as you are implying to cause cell damage or other run away reactions. As a matter of fact, the three analogs were created to express specifically three antigenic targets: full length S protein (WT). full length S protein with deleted furin cleavage site (delta furin) and a short consult encoding the S protein receptor binding domain. These demonstrated robust CD4 and CD8 response as well and long lived B cell (memory) and plasma cell immunity. The proteins encoded for from these analogs (to the mRNA viral in nature) were investigated as a critical target of neutralizing antibodies.
So, it appears that you are engaged in either obfuscation or promoting untruths in your process. You appear to engage in the rhetorical skill of attempting to generalize specific knowledge to fit a fact pattern that supports your opinion, but is not supported by the facts.
You clearly lack candor, and good will.
Have a pleasant evening.