And you know this, HOW, exactly?
I'm getting kind of exasperated by the "fun with numbers" that people seem to like doing on this. The official numbers don't match the doom and gloom scenario, so OF COURSE the "real" numbers (the ones the super secret evil bad guys aren't sharing with us!) are SO much worse! But of course, there's never any PROOF that these numbers truly ARE worse..we're supposed to trust that they are..cuz it's all a plot by the super secret evil shadowy bad guys to "depopulate the planet" (or something). OK..got it.
And you know this, HOW, exactly?
I'm getting kind of exasperated by the "fun with numbers" that people seem to like doing on this. The official numbers don't match the doom and gloom scenario, so OF COURSE the "real" numbers (the ones the super secret evil bad guys aren't sharing with us!) are SO much worse! But of course, there's never any PROOF that these numbers truly ARE worse..we're supposed to trust that they are..cuz it's all a plot by the super secret evil shadowy bad guys to "depopulate the planet" (or something). OK..got it.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Oh, but I've been thoroughly sickened by the "deny everything" crowd who demands that the public believe experimental vaccines based on failed technology and never tested on people with co-morbidities, and only tested a few months at a time (no long-term studies) are as safe as, or safer than, those traditional vaccines from our childhood.
Most who ridicule me for posting about vaccine risks provide posts that are research and content-free and which instead rely on ad hominem attacks. Yesterday someone pretended to refute information I posted by whining that he doesn't consider videos of research valid and would only read said research in print. That works well - censorship is in full force so content ends up on personal blogs and is then ridiculed for not being present in traditional publications.
THIS IS WHY RISK IS CENSORED AND PURGED. The CDC closed ranks with big tech and the universities, publications which receive funding (and threats) and so it is the Lancet publishes fake news and quietly retracts it later, having falsely protected the CDC party line when it was needed most.
The first, and OBVIOUS, proof I offer is that an unprecedented number of deaths are occurring following Covid-19 vaccinations and the CDC says that there are ZERO deaths attributed to the Covid vaccines. The CDC is obviously lying, as it has lied every step of the way through this plandemic (lied about illness, lied about medications, lied about lockdowns, lied about masks etc.) This is your first hint that maybe there's more the CDC is not telling us.
Note that Dr. McCullough states that in the past, 25 deaths following vaccination would get a vaccine pulled from the market, yet Covid vaccines have over 4000 deaths in VAERS, and the CDC says there's nothing to see here...
In the graphs below, the blue line indicates elevated mortality after vaccination.
The full video has more charts from around the world: Impact of COVID Vaccinations on Mortality - YouTube
You're the one with the credibility problem. You can't demonstrate that these 'vaccines' are safe. You can quote the CDC and PHarma, but you can't prove they were tested adequately over co-morbidities and age ranges, long enough with large enough sample sizes. You can't prove the trials are valid given they used the PCR test with a 90%+ false positive rate.
Lies, Damned Lies and Health Statistics – the Deadly Danger of False Positives (freerepublic.com)
https://i.imgflip.com/57x2j2.jpg
You can't explain why, historically, 25 deaths would get a vaccine pulled but 4000 deaths are dismissed with an inadequate review unlike any previous review (see the first link I posted.) There's so much you can't demonstrate because these vaccines are not safe and in spite of all the censorship, the truth is leaking out.
The truth is not on your side so you start throwing 'conspiracy' because that's all you have - attack the messenger.