Are you still jacking your jaw about black cats, Mith?
I'm starting to think somebody shed the vax on you, and you're having a cranial adverse event.
Posted on 05/16/2021 3:36:19 PM PDT by BeauBo
(President Trump's Operation Warp Speed Update)
(A bigger uptick in first shots today - second day in a row - May be a noteworthy change)
Total Vaccine Doses Delivered: 344,503,395 (20,195,100 J&J)
Administered: 273,545,207 (9,654,031 J&J)
People Vaccinated, At Least One Dose: 157,485,596
Fully Vaccinated: 123,282,685
(Excerpt) Read more at covid.cdc.gov ...
Are you still jacking your jaw about black cats, Mith?
I'm starting to think somebody shed the vax on you, and you're having a cranial adverse event.
“So you admit you don’t have any idea if the Covid vaccines cause any more problem than not taking the vaccine.”
Where in the world do you get that idea? No I never said or implied anything like that. It’s YOUR hallucination.
The 192,954 reports filed indicate that there likely are some problems with the vaccine that those not taking it would ever have, BECAUSE THEY DIDN’T TAKE THE VACCINE.
Maybe it will be revealed to you in a dream.
Good night!
My point is simple and I think I've already demonstrated it. VAERS data by itself doesn't tell you if there's a problem with the vaccines or not.
No they don't because the VAERS people may have had that exact same number of problems had they not taken the vaccine.
We can only know they had more problems if we compare them to the unvaccinated people.
But you know that.
Oh, I've been paying very close attention. Every time one of you vax-bots opens your pie-hole, some new form of illogic spews forth.
Do you realize WHY the VAERS reporting system was put in place in the first place?
To track 'adverse events' after vaccines are given. The large number of these currently is significant, and in the past, would have warranted ceasing the vaccine program. Somehow, VAERS is being ignored now.
And the number of naturally occuring events has no bearing on the vaccine related ones. Why? Because those people DIDN'T TAKE THE VAX.
This line of reasoning is simply wrong on its face, and a desperate attempt by those pushing an unnecessary, unproven, and dangerous 'vaccine' on the population.
You would be better served by using your big brain to ask youself 'why'.
Yeah, agree that was wrong to vax an unresponsive person- though there may be more to that incident- and any reports that are followed up and raise concerns are useful.
/the raw data there is not useful.
I’ve been impressed that real data on real problems with the vaxxes have been investigated very early on. Seems the clotting and myocardia reports were started to be investigated at the one in a million point.
He’s a very bad mind reader. I DON’T “think so”. His ASSumption is wrong.
Why do people think they know better what you think than you do? And when they do that why don’t they just go argue with themselves and leave the person they are hallucinating about out of it, since that’s what they are effectively doing anyway?
It’s classic strawman logical fallacy.
“No they don’t because the VAERS people may have had that exact same number of problems had they not taken the vaccine.”
How in a rational world can someone who didn’t take a vaccine have a vaccine reaction event? It’s impossible to have a reaction to a vaccine you didn’t take. That’s why the unvaccinated and the vaccinated cannot logically or rationally be compared in the way you think. It’s a mind numbing logical short circuit.
You really need to pop whatever bubble you are in and float back down to planet earth.
You tried to say that ALL adverse events get reported to VAERS, whether someone took the fax or not.
You:
No I didn't.
Yes. You did.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/3959777/posts?page=291#291
(excerpt/your own words)
True, but VAERS tracks all adverse events, not just those from vaccines.
Now you are trying to change the argument. Just admit you're stupid, and we can move on to your next stupid argument.
That's what guys like me are for, Mears. Somebody's got to lead the sheep from the slaughter.
Oh, yea. You can always count on Mrs. Mith to lower the room's average IQ.
More gibberish.
Are you drunk?
They can’t.
But as the CDC says VAERS doesn’t track “vaccine reaction” events, it tracks events that occur following, not necessarily because of, a vaccination.
The only way to see if the vaccinated and unvaccinated have a different frequency of medical events is to compare the two groups.
Unvaccinated people can’t have an adverse reaction to a vaccine but vaccinated people may not either. VAERS by itself can’t tell you.
Yea, it kinda does. Which is the whole entire purpose of the VAERS system.
In that post we were discussing reporting to VAERS, which is for vaccinated people by definition. The question was, for that group do all events get reported or only “vaccine related” events.
Commercial quality trolls know context matters.
Doh!!!
Wrongo, Chumley. the 'VAERS people' would not have been reported to if nobody took the vax. If there was no vax, then any 'adverse event' would be seen as 'naturally occurring.
When you add the component of a possibly dangerous chemical injected into the body, all bets are off. Again, the whole purpose of VAERS is to monitor the safety of vaccinations.
But you know that. Or do you?
You do realize what VAERS is all about, yes?
I'm staring to wonder.
Hey, the CDC knows about “social media”.
So don’t assume a troll that makes anti-vaxxers look silly is against vaxxes!
Haha. Nice try. Nope. You never once said that nonsensical statement until just now. Which makes no sense either.
Admit your error and move on. People may forget by tomorrow and you can start fresh.
Commercial quality trolls know context matters.
Government drone trolls and logic are not on speaking terms. Which is why you pop off the way you do.
I’m gonna be pissed if I just got caught up in a Rachel Walensky psyop.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3955998/posts
Now dig, rabbit, dig. Put some actual work in instead of asking other people to do it for you.
I will predict your rebuttal. 'This guy's a quack'.
Anyway, the information is there.
Yes, 4,000 is greater than 25. You are welcome for doing the math for you.
You ARE good for something. Nice.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.