Posted on 05/16/2021 3:36:19 PM PDT by BeauBo
(President Trump's Operation Warp Speed Update)
(A bigger uptick in first shots today - second day in a row - May be a noteworthy change)
Total Vaccine Doses Delivered: 344,503,395 (20,195,100 J&J)
Administered: 273,545,207 (9,654,031 J&J)
People Vaccinated, At Least One Dose: 157,485,596
Fully Vaccinated: 123,282,685
(Excerpt) Read more at covid.cdc.gov ...
Go to the VAERS website and see for yourself.
The correct answer is no.
Doesnât mean reports are not valid, nor that the information does not warrant monitoring or follow up.
Just means your interpretation of the data in general is likely flawed, as many others have attempted to explain.
“With no tracking of medical events in an unvaccinated population to compare with these VAERS reports are useless for determining the safety of the vaccines”
VAERS, by definition and purpose, is not intended for tracking medical events in the unvaccinated population. VAERS is specifically for tracking VACCINE adverse events ONLY. They make that very, very, clear.
CDC tracks medical events in the unvaccinated population elsewhere.
I can’t believe I have to explain this to you when it’s so clear, obvious, and logical.
Good luck. I was hoping my antibody test came back positive since that would have meant I had antibodies, immunity, etc., but came back negative...
First time I was disappointed in a good result... đ
âfollowing vaccinationâ is exactly the same as “after a black cat crossed my path”.
To a reasonably intelligent person no causality is evident.
âfollowing vaccinationâ shows no more causality than “after sunrise”.
(Though “after sunrise” at least has metaphorical content.)
I have.
Why do 99% of the reports list the vaccine manufacturer?
Because it’s the VACCINE Adverse Event Reporting System.
There’s no other logical way to interpret that.
I know.
CDC tracks medical events in the unvaccinated population elsewhere.
Where? From the start I've been saying show me those numbers.
Only by comparing the VAERS numbers with the rate of events in the unvaccinated population will the VAERS reports be useful.
Are there more or fewer deaths/events per thousand in the vaccinated or unvaccinated population?
No it’s not exactly the same. That a very bad analogy.
Some of the reports by reasonably intelligent people who are far more honest than you state; “a causal relationship cannot be excluded”.
âBased on the current available information and temporal association between the use of the product and the onset of the pain, a causal relationship cannot be excluded.â
https://www.medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php?IDNUMBER=1061911
âConsidering temporal association and lacking of alternative explanation, a possible contributory role of BNT162B2 to all reported events cannot be completely excluded.â
https://www.medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php?IDNUMBER=1100529IDNUMBER=1061911
âBased on the time association, the possible contribution of suspect BNT162B2 to the events cannot be excluded.â
https://www.medalerts.org/vaersdb/findfield.php?IDNUMBER=976871
Doubling down on stupid, I see.
This really isn't complicated.
Apparently it is to you. But there's still hope. All you gotta do is post a link off the VAERS site that lists adverse events of people that DIDN'T get the vax. That should be easy someone as clever a boy as you.
I'll wait.
That's rich coming from a guy displaying his ignorance so lavishly in real time.
Do you understand that an event following a vaccination is not necessarily an event resulting from a vaccination?
Yea, but that wasn't the argument. You tried to say that ALL adverse events get reported to VAERS, whether someone took the fax or not. Now you're trying to change the subject out of embarrassment.
You're saying VAERS indicates there's a problem vs. unvaccinated people. Show me why you think so.
The “temporal association” is merely that one event happened after the other.
Only If one instead compares the “adverse events” that happen after a black cat crosses their path with what “adverse effects” happen after a black doesn’t cross their path then one has some possibly useful information about the effect of black cats crossing one’s path.
As has been repeatedly pointed out to you- to no response.
Sheep cannot be Rangers. They can only be sheep.
Sheep do what they're told and follow the herd.
I see you haven't been paying attention. That's what I've been asking for from the start.
If you don't know what's happening in the unvaccinated population you don't know if the number of events in the vaccinated population is abnormal.
I guess he expects you to just accept his insanity and move along, which is never a good idea. If you do that, he will be emboldened to keep saying stupid stuff all over the place.
Seems to me you'd know it.
Unless of course, this whole covid 'endemic' is bogus, including the fake vax.
No I didn't.
I said CDC wants all adverse events in vaccinated people to be recorded whether they were the result of the vaccine or not.
And I provided the quote from the CDC website saying exactly that.
âtemporal associationâ isn’t the point, âa causal relationship cannot be excludedâ is.
You need to learn to be more honest, it will help develop a logical thought process.
And here I thought semi-retard would win the prize for saying the stupidest thing today.
I should never underestimate the power of Mrs. Mith.
They donât follow the herd with the right sheep dog.....like the ones I had.
.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.