Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Drago; MayflowerMadam

Why was AIDS/HIV never considered a “public health emergency”?


43 posted on 05/14/2021 5:47:47 PM PDT by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: thecodont

“Why was AIDS/HIV never considered a “public health emergency”?”

That’s an interesting question. Because in addition to training employees on HIPAA, I trained on “Bodily Fluids and Bloodborne Pathogens” (HIV related). It seems that one subject would have “leaked” into the other, but it never did that I can recall.


44 posted on 05/14/2021 5:54:05 PM PDT by MayflowerMadam (I prefer the challenges of life to the guaranteed existence - Prof. Dean Alfange)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

To: thecodont

Why was AIDS/HIV never considered a “public health emergency”?


It was/is and “surveillance”/tracking was implemented:

https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/guidelines/reporting.html

https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/statistics/surveillance/index.html

You usually don’t need to use a condom while in WalMart, Coostco or Trader Joe’s. ;-)


45 posted on 05/14/2021 5:58:11 PM PDT by Drago
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

To: thecodont

Why was AIDS/HIV never considered a “public health emergency”?

Because it was not a dangerous public health disease unless your were gay.

Fauccie knew that and lied that it was going to destroy the world population.


53 posted on 05/14/2021 6:37:44 PM PDT by Grampa Dave (Don’t mask! Don’t tell! by GranTorino!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson