Posted on 05/14/2021 7:29:34 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
Yup. Automating the voter roll lists and hooking them up to the voting machines means it's incredibly easy to find voters who did not vote and just use a randomizer to pick their names and use them to stuff the ballot box.
I agree, there have always been shenanigans. The difference, the way I see it, is this:
1. In the past, it was political parties cheating. The actual US government probably wasn’t involved directly. Now, FEDGOV is weaponized and using all of it’s power to hide and probably help it.
2. In the past, it required those counting the ballots to be corrupt. Now it only takes those with internet access to change the ballots and a couple other people to allow ballots be placed after hours in a facility.
3. In the past, a recount could see if there was a ‘counting’ error. Now, a recount is useless because it all computerized and ballots are just made up.
4. In the past, the media wasn’t watched, bugged, threatened, and controlled by 6 ‘independent’ owners who are likely connected to government with 3 letter acronyms.
5. In the past, Americans would not have welcomed help from adversarial foreign countries.
No, there might have been some homegrown shenanigans in the past. What we have now is world wide industrial fraud.
Yes and as Pete pointed out, they could also print or fill out stacks of ballots and throw them into the mix after the fact, so that if there were to be a hand count they would find that they match. So you could either just adjust the database by hand, or you could insert a flood of pre-filled ballots after the fact and assign them to no-show “voters”, or both.
These are all reasons why we have a pretty standard and thought out process (that was thrown out the window) that involves validating signatures and the like. My understanding is that this validation process is now also automated for mail-in ballots, and whomever runs those systems can adjust the settings so that even if the signature is 30% similar (e.g. 70% unlike the original signature) the computer will consider it valid. And once the signature envelope and ballot are separated, there is no way to trace the ballots back to the signature. I believe it was reported, before the election, that Nevada did something like that.
Agreed. We are on the precipice. Of what... I don’t know but it can’t be good. But they will tell us it’s good. Or for our own good.
Where are the “crack” reporters from the MSM who should be asking these questions?
Contempt of court!
Who's shocked??? Anyone?? Bueller?? Bueller??
That was near-certainly the method in Atlanta-Fulton County GA: Stop counting, send “everybody” home, and carry in a few reams of printed one-vote-for-Biden paper ballots.
500 “votes” per ream, you only need a few cartons of plain paper.
Something truly is amiss with the election results.
Across the entire country now the democrat plague is upon us with Biden and pals more eyes are opening.
Exactly. What many don’t realize is that it doesn’t necessarily take that many votes to throw an election. What is that quote attributed to Joseph Kennedy, something like “I am not spending $1 more for any more votes than needed to win”.
Never mind the ‘national landslide’ numbers, though they are suspicious too. Perhaps the cheaters went a little overboard. But it’s a given that the very populous states like CA, NY and IL will go apx 60-40 Dem. That’s a lot of votes on the scoreboard. But as you know that’s not how POTUS elections are decided. You could win 100% of the vote in those states and still lose an electoral landslide. It only takes a few thousand or maybe a few tens of thousands of votes in a couple key states and/or counties. And if you could ‘switch’ votes in a database, you really don’t even need that.
Yes. At this point, we won’t be able to correct the last election, but scores of people need to be put in jail. Future election workers must know without a doubt that if they cannot prove proper chain of evidence, they will be personally held liable, and the consequences will be severe. I know many of our blue state prosecutors have been compromised, but we are talking about swing states here. There still is some law there.
Hold on. Not that simple. In AZ, the hand ballots would have to match the computers-—not just in totals but from EACH SPECIFIC LD. Since a majority of LDs in AZ are GOP that would be tough. Since GOP observers were in virtually all LDs and did not report any such thing, that would be tougher.
Unmasked: Have we uncovered the truth about the 2020 election? https://chute.rocks/nskOC1a6YnST via
@BitChute
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.