To: NobleFree
Good. It’s a state’s rights issue. Let them decide. This isn’t in the FedGov’s swimlane.
2 posted on
05/13/2021 6:55:42 AM PDT by
cuban leaf
(We killed our economy and damaged our culture. In 2021 we will pine for the salad days of 2020.)
To: cuban leaf
Agree 100%. (You'd think that would go without saying on a pro-Constitution forum ... but we shall see.)
4 posted on
05/13/2021 6:57:22 AM PDT by
NobleFree
("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
To: cuban leaf
We can either properly claim this as a states rights and personal freedom issue, or let the other side do it. Frankly, I’m surprised they haven’t shoved a bill through already.
To: cuban leaf
Agreed. Leave it to the States.
30 posted on
05/13/2021 7:23:07 AM PDT by
dinodino
( )
To: cuban leaf
“Good. It’s a state’s rights issue. Let them decide. This isn’t in the FedGov’s swimlane.”
Agree 100%. Like it or not, pot is now firmly entrenched in our culture. That makes pot prohibition as futile and stupid as alcohol prohibition. It is past time to shift gears and go into regulatory mode.
33 posted on
05/13/2021 7:24:13 AM PDT by
beef
(The Chinese have a little secret—diversity is _not_ a strength.)
To: cuban leaf
I am neither agreeing nor disagreeing with your statement, but I have a question. (I have a strategic reason for remaining neutral.)
Should employer penalties attached to employee actions under the influence of cannabis be relaxed if it becomes legal?
80 posted on
05/13/2021 10:46:28 AM PDT by
MortMan
(Shouldn't "palindrome" read the same forward and backward?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson