He has no evidence of vote rigging by algorithm. The main problem is his assumption that counting machines like Dominion know who the voters are. Then he assumes there's a way the counting machine adjusts the votes by adjusting the number of voters in each age group to match a formula.
But the counting machines are fed anonymous ballots. Recording who voted is done separately. There's a stub or wrapper around the ballot with the voter's name and that is separated from the ballot. The ballots fed into the counting machines are anonymous. Frank's assumption that the counting machine can adjust the votes based on voter information is simply wrong.
Updating the database of who voted is done separately using the stubs torn from the ballots.
Isn’t the story that the machines were set up to kick out a large amount of ballots as defective and then “adjudicate” them according to a set percentage? That was the way the machines were set to adjust the votes in what I remember reading about it a couple of months ago.
Can you please surmise for all of the “thinking people” the logic of having computer networking/internet functionality on a vote ballot scanning/counting machine?