BREAKING: Disaster at Arizona Election Audit, Senate Dems Settle Lawsuit by Removing Signature Verification

beckernews.com ^ | 5/5/2021 | kyle becker

[MadMax, the Grinning Reaper]

Poorly written article....!!!

[UnwashedPeasant]

Every ballot should have a serial number and should be scanned and put online. We should all be able to do our own audits.

The same with signature-matching and the list of who voted.

This will let each voter confirm his own vote.

These reforms need to be standard requirements across states.

[napscoordinator]

This thing is becoming a mess. They are 10 percent into the process. The city needs the place in mid May. Republicans say count will take all summer. Now they are looking for bamboo to see if China sent ballots. Of corse the 10 percent have to be looked at again since they just brought in a special camera that looks for bamboo. Yay! What a way to run an audit.

[griswold3]

Exactly. There cannot be loose ends with the 2020 election. The Left bases everything on “Trump’s Big Lie” about the election being stolen.

[lodi90]

It’s a mess because the GOP is play fighting and trying to dupe the GOP base into thinking they actually care about the stolen election. Their hearts are just not in this battle.

[napscoordinator]

Did you watch the guy talking about bamboo?

[napscoordinator]

No way. Can you imagine that being on line. Oh you voted for trump? Your fired or your house burns down or any myriad of things democrats could do to trump voters.

[Pete Dovgan]

My guess is that the signature verification process isn’t the key element that they need to expose.

Massive voter fraud would have required a list of voters(voter roles) and pre printed ballots (illegal ones), active computer access to who has voted (modems), and internet access to the registered people’s signatures (for reproduction) .

The process goes like this: when the polls close, or get close to closing, the computers identify people who have not voted. Ballots are assigned to their names in bulk, and envelopes are printed with their on file signatures. Ballots, envelopes are then counted. The person, who never voted, has now voted for Joe Biden.

If you do a recount it will match. If you do an audit it will match. If you do a census, more people voted than claim to have voted! If you ask people if they voted, and they say no, then you can start closing in.

[Golden Eagle]

For those counting on this being a big boom game-changer in our favor, I refer you to: “Durham”

Not to mention Mueller, Huber, and all the other false hopes we were fed by some on this board (ahem). Glad to see you’ve finally caught on.

[pghbjugop]

Simply introducing fraudulent ballots into the tally is all this takes, fraudulent signatures takes many people and lots of coordination. A single person with a copy machine is all you need, over simplifying I know, but the point is the same. Signatures do change over time. Barcoded ballots could work, but again, Dems print ballots with bad barcodes, machines reject the ballots then Dems sue to have them counted claiming not voters fault they were given bad barcodes. Signatures MEAN NOTHING. Proving fraud MEANS NOTHING, cause it doesn’t prove who fraud favored. Biden could have won by 110k instead of 10k votes because of fraud. You have to be able to invalidate individual ballots to change the outcome and provide a basis for other states to do the same, otherwise Dems will use as ammo to pass laws to prevent audits and codify fraud in the future, which they are now.

[Vaduz]

Democrats busted on fake votes they don’t want people to know how many were fake.

If the parties cannot resolve the issue in a mutually agreeable manner, Plaintiffs may seek emergency injunctive.

[Dr. Franklin]

My guess is that the signature verification process isn’t the key element that they need to expose.

The focus is on the actual ballots. Examination of the signatures could prove fraud, but still doesn't prove for whom those fraudulent ballots were cast. Finding fake ballots means they can be disallowed more easily.

Massive voter fraud would have required a list of voters(voter roles) and pre printed ballots (illegal ones), active computer access to who has voted (modems), and internet access to the registered people’s signatures (for reproduction) .

The process goes like this: when the polls close, or get close to closing, the computers identify people who have not voted. Ballots are assigned to their names in bulk, and envelopes are printed with their on file signatures. Ballots, envelopes are then counted. The person, who never voted, has now voted for Joe Biden.

They cheated every way they could since they knew the FIB and DOJ didn't care. The fix was in. Be prepared to learn they cheated in more ways than you thought they would or could. Remember people who went to vote in places were told they had already voted. Then there is the whole business of "adjudicating" ballots. So, fake ballots added to Joe and Ho's totals while "adjudication" subtracted from Trump. Trump won in a landslide, so the cheating was massive. It should be found by an honest audit. It has also been suggested that in places like Maricopa County, they had an army of phantom voters ready to deploy to "vote". That may be the last thing that gets checked, but it will be checked. The DOJ is calling knocking on doors looking for phantom voters suspect voter intimidation.

If you do a recount it will match. If you do an audit it will match. If you do a census, more people voted than claim to have voted! If you ask people if they voted, and they say no, then you can start closing in.

Let's see what the audits reveal.. It appears that the original plan was to use the algorithm, and Trump won by bigger margins than anticipated. That caused a panic which likely resulted in a few forced errors that can be found and proved.

[SamAdams76]

This is about the eighth time I've seen this article posted here. Normally I couldn't care less how many times an article gets posted here - I'm not one of the duplicate thread pyschos.

But it does seem that certain people seem to be in a lot of haste to come here with demoralizing news that has not even been vetted yet by any semi-reliable source in order to get people worked up over nothing.

Why is that?

If I see Trump comment on this with one of his statements (which are now coming out several times a week on this website), then I will know that we have something to worry about.

[stockpirate]

With this the democrats have won a major victory

[stockpirate]

Part of the problem is that the current scan can tell if the ballot was folded, if not it’s invalid. Also there were reports of ballots being processed in numerical order, by the thousands which is impossible