"Stay-at-Home Lockdowns Made No Difference to Covid Deaths in U.S. States – Study"
FR: Never Accept the Premise of Your Opponent’s Argument
Lockdowns need to be ordered early enough, like PDJT did, before a virus has had a chance to spread, or they are worthless imo.
More specifically, the purpose of ordering a lockdown early enough is to “flatten the curve” so that medical facilities won't be overwhelmed with victims.
On the other hand, politically correct, “Orange Man Bad” lockdowns ordered too late by desperate Democrats are worthless because virus has had chance to spread. So you consequently lockdown with somebody who probably already has virus and get infected.
And when lockdowns are in effect in winter, unless you’re taking vitamin D3 dietary supplements, you’re probably not going to get enough sunlight on your skin to produce D3 which helps to stop the virus in my nonmedical opinion.
Next, on a broader issue, patriots need to primary (2022) federal and state lawmakers who refuse to agree that Congress and the Oval Office don’t have the express constitutional authority to dictate domestic policy and promise to let each state decide its own domestic policy as the founders had intended.
Also, when the federal government accuses someone of violating a law, judges and law enforcement officials should be required to do the following.
Judges and law-enforcement officials need to inform the accused of the constitutional clause(s) that arguably justifies the allegedly broken law for further scrutiny of the constitutionality of that law, especially where unconstitutional federal peacetime gun control laws are concerned imo.