Why allow a person on the jury to be seated who states he supports BLM?
The rally he attended was a march to commentate the MLK March on Washington.
He was not asked if he attended an MLK March.
I already explained why an attorney may not strike a defendant (lesser of two evils) and regardless of what the rally started out as, the focus change to a protest about George Floyd.
The juror lied on his questionnaire. This is grounds for an appeal. Will it be successful, I don't know. But grounds, very strong grounds, exist.