Dershowitz described the raid as violative of Fourth Amendment protections against unlawful search and seizure. He added that the FBI’s seizure of Giuliani’s electronic devices undermines attorney-client privilege — and other prevailed communications — given Giuliani’s role as an attorney, particularly as legal counsel for former President Donald Trump.
Calm down Alan, keep your underwear on!
2 posted on
05/04/2021 12:06:17 AM PDT by
proust
(All posts made under this handle are, for the intents and purposes of the author, considered satire.)
To: MarvinStinson
I am ‘disappointed’ that Dershowitz got snookered into believing that Garland would be an impartial US AG.........
4 posted on
05/04/2021 12:17:38 AM PDT by
cranked
To: MarvinStinson
Merrick is a toadie, nothing more.
He’s a guy who doesn’t believe that a crime can be committed after dark.
The man’s a stooge, a cypher, an apparatchik who does not believe in the Rule of Law if it is not partisan enough for his liking.
To: MarvinStinson
Well, the old “I am a lawyer and everything is privileged communication” certainly worked well enough for sHrillary!
7 posted on
05/04/2021 12:45:24 AM PDT by
texas booster
(Join FreeRepublic's Folding@Home team (Team # 36120) Cure Alzheimer's!)
To: MarvinStinson
To: MarvinStinson
Criminal democrat party government...again.
11 posted on
05/04/2021 2:00:24 AM PDT by
joma89
(Buy weapons and ammo, folks, and have the will to use them.)
To: MarvinStinson
Harvard Law School Professor Emeritus Alan Dershowitz said he was “disappointed” in Attorney General Merrick Garland’s approval of a search warrant for the FBI to raid Rudy Giuliani’s apartment.Assuming that Garland was a brilliant student at Harvard Law School, he HAD to know the difference between a search warrant and a subpoena. What might have been Merrick's motive for violating the constitution's fourth amendment?
Does he still have aspirations to be a member of the Supreme Court? Does he want to be selected as one of the new four members to pack the court?
Does Garland want to set new precedent for Biden's totalitarian regime?
12 posted on
05/04/2021 3:11:35 AM PDT by
olezip
To: MarvinStinson
Garland is the Heinrich Himmler of our times.
He very likely keeps a cyanide pill in his pocket at all times.... for when he will need it.
To: MarvinStinson
Dershowitz is a hero here for daring to publicly stand up for American law.
It’s so rare among these so-called Democrats. Bunch of Stasi criminals, the whole lot of them.
14 posted on
05/04/2021 5:17:27 AM PDT by
romanesq
(TRUSTY THE PLAN! ChiCom Joe is the Plan? Que magnificent! 👹)
To: MarvinStinson
Garland has made quite clear he had no business being on the Supreme Court.
15 posted on
05/04/2021 8:09:59 AM PDT by
lepton
("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
To: MarvinStinson
Amendments they don’t last forever.
Huh Joe
18 posted on
05/04/2021 10:18:46 AM PDT by
Vaduz
(women and children to be impacIQ of chimpsted the most.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson