It’ll be interesting to see whether SCOTUS has an appetite for this case. Honestly, I was pretty surprised they took the NY case. Not because they shouldn’t have taken it, but because they’ve passed up over a dozen cases they absolutely should have taken leading up to that.
I have no doubt there enough votes to solidly establish that Americans have every right to carry firearms outside the home. My only question is how far the court is willing to take that with the current justices. It’s a real shame President Trump didn’t get one or two more opportunities to appoint Supreme Court justices.
“It’ll be interesting to see whether SCOTUS has an appetite for this case.”
Hope so, magazine restrictions are a backdoor way of inhibiting our 2nd amendment firearms rights when banning firearms completely becomes difficult for elected officials to achieve. If they can’t ban firearms completely, just pass laws that reduce their effectiveness to the point where weapons eventually become useless. If unchecked, they won’t just stop at 10 rounds, one round limits could eventually be required for all firearms.