Posted on 04/26/2021 6:25:49 AM PDT by Eleutheria5
She was scared. Dershowitz also weighs in.
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
One more reason the verdict should be overtired on appeal.
So what? They came to the “right verdict”. That’s how things work in a communist paradise.
“overtired” a perfect Freudian slip.
I knew from the beginning that, the only verdict that would satisfy liberals and the black community, was to find Chauvin guilty.
All of the jurors were afraid for their lives. So, deliberation was just for show, and they all knew, even before any of the evidence was heard/shown, that they had to find Chauvin guilty. Fear causes many wrong things to occur.
Big show trial, followed by either quiet execution in the basement, or death in the Gulag. Hope Chauvin isn’t put in gen-pop.
The two quotes from her described her personal fear, rather than “among jury” which suggests more than one. While there might have been, the specific quotes don’t support that.
“Fear causes many wrong things to occur.”
It empowers Democrats these days. Covid, riots. Hatred and envy also helps them a lot.
Ingraham refers to more explicit statements from her made later off camera. The iceberg might be there under the water, but the tip of it doesn’t support that.
It was pretty dumb of her to show her face on camera. A mob could still take revenge on her for a successful appeal, saying her interview with Laura was calculated to produce that result, and they could still come to her home.
That was no trial, it was a lynching...
The man has to be left out!
Unfortunately the court system all the way to the top is also fearful.
“... the only verdict that would satisfy liberals and the black community, was to find Chauvin guilty.”
I disagree slightly ... the only event that will satisfy the left regardless of race, is when Chauvin is pronounced dead due to a perforated kidney or slit throat.
Ex-cops are rarely are placed into gen-pop but who knows with these commie bastids. My aunt is married to one. As a cop, he put a drunk guy into a coma many years ago with a nightstick and should have been tried for murder but it took over a year for the guy to expire. He was then charged with manslaughter and found guilty. Got one measly year and served it all in a brig on an AF base. He was let out daily to do landscaping and such. This happened in the early 70’s and I refuse to associate with either one of them to this day.
“It was pretty dumb of her to show her face on camera”
She’s confident that the police will protect her!
Oh Wait...they won’t be showing up because they’re all terrified of being locked up themselves if they do anything and get convicted by people like her.
Never mind.
Dumb? The woman is a fatuous moron.
As Brave Sir Roberts has already shown. Probably fired the law clerk who disclosed the conversation he had in chambers about the Texas case. That might have been justified. Law clerks are supposed to be discreet, but I wouldn’t want to work for such a poltroon either. Now we know Brave Sir Roberts’ nature.
Bravely bold Sir Robin
Rode forth from Camelot.
He was not afraid to die,
Oh brave Sir Robin.
He was not at all afraid
To be killed in nasty ways.
Brave, brave, brave, brave Sir Robin.
He was not in the least bit scared
To be mashed into a pulp.
Or to have his eyes gouged out,
And his elbows broken.
To have his kneecaps split
And his body burned away,
And his limbs all hacked and mangled
Brave Sir Robin.
His head smashed in
And his heart cut out
And his liver removed
And his bowls unplugged
And his nostrils raped
And his bottom burnt off
And his penis
“That’s, that’s enough music for now lads, there’s dirty work afoot.”
Brave Sir Robin ran away.
(”No!”)
Bravely ran away away.
(”I didn’t!”)
When danger reared it’s ugly head,
He bravely turned his tail and fled.
(”I never!”)
Yes, brave Sir Robin turned about
And gallantly he chickened out.
(”You’re lying!”)
Swiftly taking to his feet,
He beat a very brave retreat.
Bravest of the brave, Sir Robin!
Not to mention fat. Oh, wait. So am I.
Note that she was not in the least bit afraid of white supremacists.
High tech lynching.
How about 13 attorneys vs 1.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.