[ThunderStruck94]

So I researched the mRNA testing a bit and by no means am I an expert. The last mRNA “vaccine” trials were for the SARs virus. From what I read, half the test subjects died starting around 6 months from receiving the test shot. Not sure what happened after that and really don’t care. That is all I needed to know.

[RushIsMyTeddyBear]

Yikes!

[z3n]

From what I read, half the test subjects died starting around 6 months from receiving the test shot.

~~~

Okay okay. :/
I was about to snidely ask where they are piling the bodies, but I guess we will have to wait now.

This all reads wayyyy to fringe to me. I purposefully got the J&J because the idea of a vaccine that is based off of RNA seemed unnecessarily risky to me, but this is just out-there stuff.

I suppose we wont have to wait that long to find out though. It’s not like Greta or AOC predicting climate doom in 12 years.

[ReaganGeneration2]

mRNA issues have erupted in trials in the past. They have never been fixed.

[StAnDeliver]

"So I researched the mRNA testing a bit and by no means am I an expert. The last mRNA “vaccine” trials were for the SARs virus. From what I read, half the test subjects died starting around 6 months from receiving the test shot."

Citation? Link?

[StAnDeliver]

"From what I read, half the test subjects died starting around 6 months from receiving the test shot. Not sure what happened after that and really don’t care. That is all I needed to know."

There is no reference to "half the test subjects died around 6 months from receiving the test shot" in either the story you provided the link to, nor the Journal of Virology abstract the story links to. There is nothing in either the story or the abstract like what you have asserted.

Why is that?