Found herehttps://gab.com/kittylists/posts/106099995062682468
Posted on 04/20/2021 11:32:37 PM PDT by knighthawk
Fox News' Tucker Carlson and Sean Hannity differed in opinion about the Derek Chauvin decision during their segments on Tuesday night as ABC's Sunny Hostin broke down on air after the jury handed the former Minneapolis cop a guilty verdict for the death of George Floyd.
Hannity told his viewers that the video evidence in this case was 'substantial, it was overwhelming, and it was appalling'.
He said that the decision 'is in no way an indictment of all police officers. This is a guilty verdict for one police officer'.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
I agree with Tucker. Our laws are now meaningless. Wokeness is all that matters
Wait. Sean Hannity supports the verdict and how it was reached? After Maxine and Joe publicly flapped their gums about it? Sean!
And probably a minor part of the evidence presented at trial. How important it was to the jurors only they know.
Found hereCucks
And without any interest in an appeal.
FOP obviously run by political bitches.
If you are a LEO... GET OUT NOW! Don’t put yourself in the position of taking the blame for an idiot to satisfy an amoral ungrateful public.
I like Tucker and agree with him on many things. However, what he said is pure speculation on his part. Making such statements without proof makes him look foolish and opens him up to criticism.
TRUE FREINDS... Yeah... I know...
I was a Rush fan. But NEVER a hannity fan. hannity is every bit the liar as the democrats and the left. All he cares about is his own hide. He’s got a great deal with... He’s a lying SOB and always has been. Rush lived it, hannity is just a con.
Of course the coward jury caved! They deliberated for what...maybe 6 or 7 hours of actual sifting through the evidence?!
The jury treated the case disrespectfully and did not take the proper time to examine the evidence.
No way does the evidence support anything except maybe the lowest charge (2nd degree manslaughter, presumptive sentence 4 years). If the judge had any guts he’d set aside the two more serious charges and give him 8-10 years. He’ll win on appeal.
I watched 2/3rds of the trial and as much fair analysis as I could. I’m admittedly pro-cop and I would have said not guilty on all counts. The rioters be damned.
“Building a Proud Tradition”
sure it is. /s
Deliberated about 11 hours.
I stopped watching TV. But on Hannity radio he has been saying Chauvin was wrong all along. This is same guy who boasts about how fair he was in reporting Duke Lacrosse, VA case.
And Richard Jewell case.
As if he’s not already open to criticism, speaking out against anything opens you to criticism
Chauvin killed Floyd, period. Let him rot in prison. Freepers who support Chauvin disgust me.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.