Posted on 04/15/2021 6:50:33 AM PDT by Jan_Sobieski
ARLINGTON, Virginia, April 14, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) – Pentagon scientists have developed a gel-style, tissue-like microchip to be inserted underneath the skin, touted to be able to detect COVID-19 before an individual develops symptoms, prompting concerns about the manner in which such technology would be used to infringe upon people’s liberties and usher in a bio-security state.
The revelation came as part of a CBS 60 Minutes report on April 11 titled “military programs aiming to end pandemics forever.”
Dr. Matt Hepburn of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), which is dubbed the Pentagon’s “department of mad science,” explained how he had been tasked to develop technology that would “take pandemics off the table.”
Describing the mission of DARPA, Hepburn commented that they “challenge the research community to come up with solutions that may sound like science fiction. And we’re very willing to take chances with high-risk investments that may not work.”
“But if they do, we can completely transform the landscape.”
The retired colonel showed CBS a “subdermal implant … a tissue-like gel engineered to continuously test your blood,” which would monitor a person’s health.
(Excerpt) Read more at lifesitenews.com ...
2 Thessalonians 2: 11 And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie: 12 That they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness.
What could possibly go wrong?
Yay...
I want me one of them chip things
60 minutes is dead to me.
NO FREAKING THANKS!
AIN’T HAPPENING TO ME.
I’m sure the Pentagon has had this for years... but now that commies are in power in the Pentagon we get to hear how ‘helpful’ it would be...
Notice how progressive pigs don’t call to ‘defund’ the military?
Or ‘intelligence’...
Or the DOJ?
I’m sure the Pentagon has had this for years... but now that commies are in power in the Pentagon we get to hear how ‘helpful’ it would be...
Notice how progressive pigs don’t call to ‘defund’ the military?
Or ‘intelligence’...
Or the DOJ?
I am sure it does a bit more then test for covid
The only implant I want is Musk’s Neuralink. I think being a cyborg like that would be kewl, especially if it can enhance senses, memory, and math.
If it can track one thing, it can easily be adapted to track another. Once it’s under your skin, they make it impossible to do anything essential without it, so ripping it out of your body gets you nowhere.
Same thing with the “vaccine passport”. They are making it impossible to do what you need to do to live without the “passport.”
Do you really think that the “passport,” your Facebook page, your driving record and your microchip won’t be all linked to the facial recognition system that they promised wouldn’t be used to track innocent citizens?
Wait, I’ve heard this story before...
cuban leaf wrote: “60 minutes is dead to me.”
LifeSiteNews has no more credibility than 60 Minutes.
“Awww, wassa problem wid a liddl’ chip?”- Marco D’Beast
Correct. Since their most recent hatchet job on DeSantis, why would anyone not braindead enough to have voted for BeijingBinden even watch that horror?
When 60 min first came out (Yes, I am that old) I watched the first year with fascination. Then, after they assumed that they had secured an audience, the lies started. It wasn’t too far into the 2nd season that I noticed that whenever a technical subject came up (e.g., environment, nuclear power, military, medicine, etc.), a subject they couldn’t simply spin (e.g., the war on drugs is good, etc) they started outright lying. I checked at the library on articles from mags and scientific journals (yes, I’m that much of a nerd) and the closest they came to telling the truth was simply not mentioned anything “from the other side”. In most cases, they just misrepresented everything. I quit watching, and have never gone back. It’s sorta like “Trick me once, shame on you, trick me twice, shame on me.”
I’ve heard of LifeSiteNews, but that’s about it.
My point is that the MSM sources are no better than the sites like LifeSiteNews.
People believe the sources that they want to believe, it seems. But over time, info can be verified.
A simple example: I followed the Zimmerman case almost from day one on Conservative Treehouse (CT). I fully expected the verdict we got, based on the information I received from CT before the trial. People who got their news from the MSM were shocked. There is a reason for that.
Yep. It was easy for me to spot biased reporting when they, well, only presented one side and made a haphazard attempt to present the other side.
I caught Penn and Teller doing that once with their Bullshit show. They had a single “nutjob” defending one side of an issue, and a team of “experts” defending the other.
It will be recommended to “keep us safe.” Harmless little thing that is just going to protect us from that evil disease. Then mysteriously becomes mandated - if you want to go into a federal building you must have the implant. Then required for flying, public transportation. Then for grocery stores, Uber, drive through restaurants.
Then Edward Snowden reveals that they have been tracking us all along, and that they aren’t just for covid. The developers added a few additional capabilities without telling us.
Too late now. Can’t just rip the devilish devices out - if you do your paycheck stops.
Unimaginable? Don’t believe it? Care to wait around and see if this happens?
cuban leaf wrote: “People believe the sources that they want to believe, it seems. But over time, info can be verified.”
Couldn’t agree more, that’s why I used the tag line: “Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.” Funny thing is the number of people who’ve attacked me for saying that, they ‘follow the science’.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.