Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Liberals ramp up calls for Supreme Court Justice Breyer to retire after he panned court packing in speech
Fox News ^ | By Tyler Olson |

Posted on 04/10/2021 8:11:08 AM PDT by BenLurkin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last
To: BenLurkin

“those who ... favor... court packing, think long and hard before they embody those changes in law.”

They have thought long and hard, and so should you and Roberts.


41 posted on 04/10/2021 9:57:25 AM PDT by Brian Griffin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Hope Breyer tells them all to go to Hell.

Even though he sits on SCOTUS he deserves his personal opinion. Bully for him for sharing it.


42 posted on 04/10/2021 10:06:30 AM PDT by upchuck (Corporations don’t pay taxes. They collect them. From us. ~ h/t Little Ray)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HartleyMBaldwin
RULE 4: “Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.”

RULE 9: “The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.”

A living Constitution implies a living precedent. Change the headcount and it's all up for grabs. Bidet may win for 4 years but when the tide turns - and it will - then effectively repeal the New Deal interpretation of the CC since the living Constitution DEMANDS it.


43 posted on 04/10/2021 10:08:52 AM PDT by DoodleBob (Gravity's waiting period is about 9.8 m/s^2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I never knew Raggety Jen worked for that radical commie group.


44 posted on 04/10/2021 10:18:26 AM PDT by Beagle8U ("NO Coke!/ NO Joke!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoodleBob

OK, then, if precedent were to be eliminated, even partially, how would that constrain a packed Supreme Court? Seems to me that it would accomplish the opposite.


45 posted on 04/10/2021 11:00:25 AM PDT by HartleyMBaldwin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

We need for nobody on the SCOTUS to retire or die in the next 2 years. I think we’ll retake the Senate in the 2022 election and will thus have the votes to block any of Pedo Joe’s nominations but we have to cross our fingers and hope for no attrition in the next 2 years.


46 posted on 04/10/2021 12:18:09 PM PDT by FLT-bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LoveMyFreedom

Isn’t it amazing how the Democrats turn on each other.


Only the extreme democrats turn on the more moderate. That is typical of the leftist revolutionary movements. And let there be no doubt about it, this is a battle against Marxism and nothing less.


47 posted on 04/10/2021 2:02:27 PM PDT by Wildbill22 ( They have us surrounded again, the poor bastards- Gen Creighton William Abrams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

An errant pillow is in his future too, looks like.


48 posted on 04/10/2021 2:03:36 PM PDT by USCG SimTech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DoodleBob

That is an interesting idea, and will play to our advantage in the long game, but I think we need to fight this full frontal first.

I doubt the left is smart enough to understand the self undermining they do with stuff like this. It has happened before. I say let them hang themselves.


49 posted on 04/10/2021 5:03:16 PM PDT by Wildbill22 ( They have us surrounded again, the poor bastards- Gen Creighton William Abrams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

When leftist democrats pack the Supreme Court, the rule of law will be dead and we will be back to the rule of man.


50 posted on 04/11/2021 12:46:15 AM PDT by joma89 (Buy weapons and ammo, folks, and have the will to use them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HartleyMBaldwin
All you need to do, is float the intent to erase stare decisis the nanosecond there is one more jurist placed on SCOTUS. There are hundereds of conservative justices below SCOTUS who will take action. Leftists will whine but as Rehnquist wrote, "precedent" isn't carved in stone. Announce that any case based on the wrong intent of the Commerce Clause will be struck down. Get a good head of steam rolling. All you need is the mere appearance of equating packing with tearing down the legal basis of Leviathan. Poison pill. And stand strong.
51 posted on 04/11/2021 7:11:06 AM PDT by DoodleBob (Gravity's waiting period is about 9.8 m/s^2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: DoodleBob

Sure, whatever. Good luck.


52 posted on 04/11/2021 7:24:24 AM PDT by HartleyMBaldwin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-52 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson