Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No, Washington DC Can’t Be A State, No Matter How Much Democrats Would Like To Ruin The Constitution For Political Power
The Federalist ^ | May Davis

Posted on 04/05/2021 8:43:02 AM PDT by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last
To: ClearCase_guy

At some point, people will just acknowledge the Constitution as a quaint old document that doesn’t really mean anything. The Left can do what it wants.


And the Right will nod and go back to sleep, except for a handful of trouble makers who will mostly be ignored, be ineffectual, and silently go away.


21 posted on 04/05/2021 9:58:12 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Would provide an excellent point in time to file a quo warranto case if -

1) Senate arrives at a tied vote to approve statehood;

2) Harris casts a tie-breaker vote as VP;

3) Statehood is approved by Congress

4) Immediately file quo warranto challenging the law on basis of contradiction of Constitution violation, Constitution reference to DC

and authority of Harris to cast vote as un-qualified VP because she is not a Natural Born Citizen. text of resolution 511

22 posted on 04/05/2021 10:02:06 AM PDT by RideForever (Know Islam, No Peace; Know Peace, No Islam ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

If the residential portions of D.C. no longer wish to be part of the Capitol, then their land should be returned to Maryland, not formed into the 51st state.


Besides the fact that MD apparently wants nothing to do with the residential portions of DC, there is still the problem of the 23rd Amendment. The rump DC would still cast 3 Electoral Votes.


23 posted on 04/05/2021 10:03:41 AM PDT by hanamizu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: caseinpoint

😆


24 posted on 04/05/2021 10:05:53 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

We do not live under the constitution. That should be patently obvious to anyone in America now.
We live under an authoritarian oligarchy that does as it pleases.
When they can use constitutional verbiage to “prove” to us that we must obey, they do so. When the verbiage stands in their way, they get a court ruling that allows them to so as they please.

Anyone remember Obamacare? The Constitution says all spending bills MUST originate in the House.

The Constitution was amended to prohibit involuntary servitude except as punishment for a crime. Woodrow Wilson started a draft. He reasoning was that since Congress declared war, they whole nation had “volunteered”. Ergo, “selective service” was merely choosing people from a giant body of volunteers!

What does the constitution say about declaring war?

What does the constitution say about direct taxes?

What does the constitution say about gun laws?

What does the constitution say about how the value of a dollar is set?

Does the constitution give the Federal government the right to regulate a creek on your property or the crop you grow and sell locally?

We are so far beyond the constitution that this person’s argument is trite and meaningless.


25 posted on 04/05/2021 10:17:59 AM PDT by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. .... )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

Does the constitution allow the Federal government to order me to stay home, close my business, wear a facemask?

We need to face it. We are living in a modern version of the USSR or Nazi Germany. The government rules by decree and has done so for years now.
The technocratic oligarchy rules by fiat and nothing else.
They rarely even pretend to do otherwise.


26 posted on 04/05/2021 10:22:27 AM PDT by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. .... )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Very well argued with concrete proof of how this can never possibly happen

The Democrap response:


27 posted on 04/05/2021 10:26:26 AM PDT by The MAGA-Deplorian (Democrats are lawless because Republicans are ball-less!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RideForever

File that quo warranto case and Roberts, closet homo Roberts, party boy Kavenaugh and Amy Conehead Barrett would swat that case down as fast as they did the Texas case.


28 posted on 04/05/2021 10:30:06 AM PDT by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. .... )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
‘Corrupting and Hampering Federal Business’

Why then is the most important Federal Agency (DOD) headquartered in sovereign Virginia?

Simple solution - retrocede residential area to Maryland. Maryland will never elect a Republican senator anyhow and, yes, one more sure D seat in the House - meh

That will shut ‘em up

29 posted on 04/05/2021 10:40:18 AM PDT by Seajay (Ordem e Progresso)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Georgia Girl 2

Forgot the old buzzard of a speaker of the house.


30 posted on 04/05/2021 10:45:13 AM PDT by caseinpoint (Don't get thickly involved in thin things.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
"Did you know what your right to own and carry a gun cannot be infringed?"

Correct and "infringed" means the federal government has no power to regulate any firearm of any type on any level whatsoever. The federal government has no authority to require background checks, firearms licenses for dealers or licenses of any type. The federal government has no authority to require any form to be filled out for any type of firearm.

The people have the god given right to own machine guns, short barrel shotguns, suppressors, armor piercing ammunition and grenade launchers.

Yet we have allowed the federal government to ban or regulate nearly every aspect of this god given right.

This article is utterly delusional. The Constitution has failed to protect us from the intrusion, oppression and tyranny of government. The Constitution has many "safeguards" built in that were supposed to protect us from a corrupt government rigging our elections. ALL OF THOSE SAFEGUARDS FAILED.

The left loves to talk about "rethinking" this or that. Maybe it's time for Americans to start doing a little rethinking.

31 posted on 04/05/2021 11:03:19 AM PDT by precisionshootist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

The Constitution? That old thing?


32 posted on 04/05/2021 11:07:53 AM PDT by TBP (Progressives lack compassion and tolerance. Their self-aggrandizement is all that matters. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: precisionshootist

When the Founders wrote the Constitution, they were operating under the false assumption (or hope),that the country would always be governed by honest men.


33 posted on 04/05/2021 11:26:06 AM PDT by shooter223 (the government should fear the citizens......not the other way around)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Ink on a parchment means nothing without enforcement.

“Conservatives” lose because they refuse to acknowledge the way the game is played.


34 posted on 04/05/2021 12:08:39 PM PDT by redgolum (If this culture today is civilization, I will be the barbarian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino
File that quo warranto case and Roberts, closet homo Roberts, party boy Kavenaugh and Amy Conehead Barrett would swat that case down as fast as they did the Texas case.

A rather pointless opinion, and it's getting warm enough now that if the quo warranto fails, it's time to pick up arms and visit Congress again. And there may be some results of recent attempts to audit election ballots that might sway SCOTUS if the fraud-filled elections are exposed for public consumption. And that adds incentive to the people picking up arms to visit Congress.

35 posted on 04/05/2021 12:17:46 PM PDT by RideForever (Know Islam, No Peace; Know Peace, No Islam ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

“The Founders thought it obvious the nation’s capital should be subject to federal, rather than state, jurisdiction.”

This is not hard to understand! The federal district was to be out of the jurisdiction of any state! It is FEDERAL! Not hard to understand. I remember that from my high school days! 100% clear to me.


36 posted on 04/05/2021 1:01:20 PM PDT by I want the USA back (I fear my government many times more than I fear the chinese kungfu virus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

If I were a real estate tycoon (**ahem**), I’d promote the simple remedy to the “no taxation without representation” argument by exempting DC residents from Federal taxes.

All those row houses in NE? All that crime ridden SE? Would turn into 12-story condos mighty fast.


37 posted on 04/05/2021 1:19:22 PM PDT by nicollo (I said no!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: precisionshootist

The reason you have guns is to protect your god given, constitutional rights. You may at some point actually have to use your weapon to protect those rights.


38 posted on 04/05/2021 1:20:00 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: caseinpoint

You left ‘cuckolds’ off yer list...


39 posted on 04/05/2021 1:47:50 PM PDT by snuffy smiff (Vsetko Umiera! Build the Wall and build it tall, then build a gallows and hang them ALL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: snuffy smiff

I did. Thanks. I also left off peacocks. The menagerie is growing.


40 posted on 04/05/2021 3:30:25 PM PDT by caseinpoint (Don't get thickly involved in thin things.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson