This American Thinker article is worthless. It speculates about how to manufacture 100,000 fake ballots, but has no proof, no data, no names, and no investigation.
Only speculation.
We need hard data, not speculation, and this article provides zero data.
You think there was no voter fraud? LOL.
634 people living in the same ups store 7 consecutive boxes, all having the same exact birthday IS evidence. You’re being dense.
They leave traces of who they were. More troublesome, they leave traces of what they are trying to hide. We are thrilled people are trying to alter data after the fact. They are leaving tracks like a dinosaur walking through a field of peanut butter for database tracking.
They've got this one... the purpose of the article is to scare low-level thugs into trying to 'cover their tracks' so they can find the 'Mr.Bigs' behind this... shake that tree...
You are right.
This article is bragging about what they can do, perhaps even what they have done, but does not even suggest that they are close to releasing a report of any kind that shows the "hot spots" of conspirators, shows the "hot spots" of addresses, lists the repeated names, etc.
If they really can build a "family tree" of connections like Ancestry.com, they should have said they are working on it and will release their report shortly. They did not.
We all know that the fraud happened. It will happen again if the collaborators are not prosecuted. Data needs to be collated to demonstrate where the suspicious activity happened and who lives at those places. The author of this article suggests that they can do that, but stops short of saying that they are doing it, or are doing it in any kind of coordination with law enforcement.
-PJ