Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Second Massachusetts city to recognize polyamorous relationships
Catholic News Agency ^ | March 20, 2021 | CNA

Posted on 03/30/2021 12:13:28 PM PDT by gattaca

Boston, Mass., Mar 20, 2021 / 06:01 am MT (CNA).- Cambridge, Massachusetts has redefined domestic partnerships to give relationships involving more than two people the same rights as a married couple.

Home to Harvard University, Cambridge is the second city in the state, after its neighbor Somerville, legally to recognize polyamory.

During a March 8 meeting, the Cambridge city council voted to redefine “domestic partnerships,” which previously had been defined as two unmarried people living together.

The new definition broadens the definition to “two or more persons” not related by blood who “are in a relationship of mutual support, caring and commitment and intend to remain in such a relationship” and “consider themselves to be a family.”

The council also removed a requirement that those in a domestic partnership must live together, as well as a provision that those in a domestic partnership must submit evidence to the city of their relationship as a family.

Somerville, which borders Cambridge, broadened its definition of domestic partnership to include polyamorous relationships during July 2020, the first in the nation to do so. Both cities are close to Boston.

Catholic scholars, including Professor Robert George of Princeton University, have said in recent years that redefining marriage could lead to a collapse of the term altogether, with people questioning why marriage requires exclusivity, permanence, and sexual fidelity. George has also noted that in a society that has rejected the idea of sexual complementarity, there is no rational basis for rejecting polyamory.

Ryan Anderson, currently president of the Ethics and Public Policy Center, told CNA last year that he was not surprised by the latest efforts to redefine marriage to include multiple people.

“Of course it was never going to stop with same-sex couples,” Anderson told CNA. “Once you redefine marriage to eliminate the male-female component, what principle requires monogamy?”

The former cultural norm of marriage between one man and one woman, Anderson said, “was that only one man and one woman could unite as one flesh as husband and wife in the very same act that could produce new life, and then connect that new life with his or her own mother and father.”

“Once the law and culture says the male-female aspect of marriage violates justice and equality, we haven’t ‘expanded’ marriage, we’ve fundamentally redefined what it is. And those redefinitions have no principled stopping point,” he said.

The Cambridge legal change was drafted with the help of the Polyamory Legal Advocacy Coalition. The group is an outgrowth of the Harvard Law School LGBTQ+ Advocacy Clinic and is supported by the American Psychological Association.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

1 posted on 03/30/2021 12:13:28 PM PDT by gattaca
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: gattaca

Here’s more on this subject...

Cambridge Will Recognize Polyamorous Partnerships and Other Domestic Arrangements With More Than 2 Adults


2 posted on 03/30/2021 12:14:30 PM PDT by gattaca ("Government's first duty is to protect the people, not run their lives." Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gattaca

https://reason.com/2021/03/10/cambridge-will-recognize-polyamorous-partnerships-and-other-domestic-arrangements-with-more-than-2-adults/


3 posted on 03/30/2021 12:15:00 PM PDT by gattaca ("Government's first duty is to protect the people, not run their lives." Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: gattaca

The next lib who says any variant of “slippery slopes don’t real” should get ... I can’t think of anything bad enough for such people.


4 posted on 03/30/2021 12:16:05 PM PDT by cdcdawg (WTF is "Jim Eagle?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gattaca

Can Harems be far behind?


5 posted on 03/30/2021 12:16:13 PM PDT by Skywise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gattaca

Sodom and Gomorrah Stage II enter right...


6 posted on 03/30/2021 12:16:48 PM PDT by Abathar (Proudly posting without reading the article carefully since 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gattaca

How does a city have the authority to recognize polyamorous marriages? If they leave the city are they just not recognized or is it bigamy?


7 posted on 03/30/2021 12:16:53 PM PDT by Dutch Boy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gattaca

MA is home of Provincetown. Mitt Romney was the popular Governor complete with early version of Obamacare (RomneyCare).

Which is quirkier and more disreputable, OR, WA or MA? Close race.


8 posted on 03/30/2021 12:19:16 PM PDT by frank ballenger (End vote fraud, harvesting,non-citizen voting & leftist media news censorship or we are finished.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gattaca
"The new definition broadens the definition to “two or more persons” not related by blood who “are in a relationship of mutual support, caring and commitment and intend to remain in such a relationship” and “consider themselves to be a family.”"

By this "definition," a group of friends can get married...you know...to share medical benefits and such.

By the way...since "we're" redefining marriage these days, why are they specifically excluding those "not related by blood?"

What's the point of that, specific, exclusion?

A rhetorical question of course.

9 posted on 03/30/2021 12:19:59 PM PDT by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gattaca

All the local Mosques approve of this decision.


10 posted on 03/30/2021 12:20:10 PM PDT by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gattaca

The ten commandments just aren’t good enough for these reprehensible bastards.


11 posted on 03/30/2021 12:21:25 PM PDT by Fungi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gattaca

My ex-husband is in a polyamory relationship. Makes me sick. He is the father of my only child. He has been in that over 20 years. We get a long, I just don’t understand.


12 posted on 03/30/2021 12:23:38 PM PDT by PeachyKeen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gattaca

13 posted on 03/30/2021 12:27:00 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gattaca

Did not think they had so many Mormons in Massachusetts.


14 posted on 03/30/2021 12:28:39 PM PDT by miserare ( Respect for life--life of all kinds-- is the first principle of civilization.~~A. Schweitzer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Skywise

Cuomo has one...in his dreams!


15 posted on 03/30/2021 12:30:32 PM PDT by miserare ( Respect for life--life of all kinds-- is the first principle of civilization.~~A. Schweitzer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: gattaca

What’s most amazing is that much of this cultural shape shifting is anti-women. “Polyamory” leads to polygamy and female servitude. Transgenderism leads to invasion of female privacy and competitive sports. Female sexuality is now considered passé and women must exhibit masculinity.

Remind me again who stands for women’s rights?


16 posted on 03/30/2021 12:39:47 PM PDT by Magnatron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gattaca

That ain’t your father’s Slummerville.

There is a town around old Boston Bay
A place where time and light stand still
Just follow your nose and heart
And soon your feet will find themselves in Somerville

The city center there is filled with streets
A sub shop graces every hill
You might think you’re dreaming
Then again you might not
Anyway, you’re in Somerville

Come watch the buildings stand up proud and tall
While far below, the pavement hugs the ground

At night the stoplights change their hue from red to green
Then they change back from green to red
A carnival of color here in Somerville
Too bad that everyone’s in bed

A wondrous place where branches hang on every tree
Where people go to work and then go home


17 posted on 03/30/2021 1:01:50 PM PDT by Flash Bazbeaux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gattaca

The penalty for having 2 wives is till the same: 2 mothers-in-law.


18 posted on 03/30/2021 1:13:00 PM PDT by o-n-money (Not my president: WRONG Not the president: RIGHT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gattaca

The Peoples Republic of Cambridge.


19 posted on 03/30/2021 1:21:59 PM PDT by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gattaca

“Of course it was never going to stop with same-sex couples,”

Get rid of the basic family structures you can do anything to the subject people.


20 posted on 03/30/2021 1:28:08 PM PDT by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson