Political Junkie Too wrote: “So far, you have not addressed any of the science that he presented. You only attacked it as opposition to the current vaccine, only challenging the motivation of the doctor but not the premise of his arguments. You attempted to diminish his credentials without evidence, suggesting allegations that were also levied at others on the other side of the debate. You invoked the silence of others as refutation instead of affirmative argument, and only generalizing these others as “healthcare professionals” without specifying the people or their CVs to make such claims.”
He has made the extraordinary claim that we should immediately cease all vaccinations that are not based upon his preferred approach. It is not my responsibility to refute those claims.
“Political Junkie Too wrote:”I want to be convinced one way or the other, but your approach is not getting me there.”
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. It is his responsibility to provide that proof and it would seem the scientific community has rejected his claims. IOW, he doesn’t have the proof required to substantiate his claims.
I believe your mind is made up. You’re only looking for information that fortifies your anti-vaxxer opinions.
-PJ