Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hawkaw

Agreed. I recall a lot of folks on this DB wanting the filibuster to end when the GOP was in control and were flipping out on me when I was suggesting that was not a great idea.

Anyway, in a few weeks I don’t see this rule being part of the Senate.


How did getting rid of the judicial filabuster work out for Democrats?

Democrats might get 60 Senate votes in the future. We’ll never get 60 conservatives. In the long run no filibuster is definitely more beneficial to the GOP.


30 posted on 03/25/2021 5:57:06 PM PDT by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: lodi90
Democrats might get 60 Senate votes in the future. We’ll never get 60 conservatives. In the long run no filibuster is definitely more beneficial to the GOP.

Why not? There are more than 30 states mostly controlled by Republicans, now.

We should have 60 Conservative Senators now.

The reason we do not, is the Left's control of the media and cheating the last election.

33 posted on 03/25/2021 8:10:51 PM PDT by marktwain (President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson