Replies

Ok. Which specific dominion machines were used to cheat?

Oh, since you are ignorant of how litigation works, (or just trolling pretending to be), let me explain how this works. If a judge determines Dominion has a case against Powell, then she is entitled to discovery, but not before. That means she would get to issue subpoenas and call witnesses, should that be necessary. So that question is a bit premature in the process. It is worth noting that a court in Naples, Italy took a full confession from Arturo D'Elia in open court under oath, and received the raw data that was switched. Since that statement was made in open court, it's not hearsay, an out of court statement, and fully admissible evidence in any U.S. court.

Certainly it wasn’t the dominion machines in Florida. Nor was it the dominion machines in Pennsylvania from the data that we have.

Your assumptions. There is a well known saying: Never ASS/U/ME anything. You assume much which is yet unexplored in any depth. It is difficult to comprehend how Dominion machines were not involved in stealing votes in Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, and Chester and Delaware counties in PA.

I’m going to pull data from dominion counties in other states. I’m willing to bet there is a similar pattern of increased voter share and vote totals for Trump in many of them. Do you think otherwise?

You are implying that Dominion machines were used to steal votes for Trump, and therefore using them to steal votes for Biden didn't happen. It's a strange argument. Considering that the steal occurred with the blessing of the FBI, I don't believe that they would turn a blind eye to anyone cheating to help Trump. Trump won so big, he didn't need anyone to cheat for him.

And yes, I understand what was written in Powell’s response. You can try to flip the script now, but if there was a “there” there, the correct response would have been “the truth is an absolute defense” and that isn’t the route she is taking.

The truth is an absolute defense, but a trial on the merits of the issue, is the last line of defense. No competent attorney would fail to make the "so what" arguments these lawyers made.

You can try to pawn it off on the lawyers if you like, but it isn’t going to work. When you can pass a bar exam, you can talk to me about “what was written.”

You have no idea what my credentials are, and I won't repeat them here. Many lawyers pass a bar exam, but aren't competent lawyers, or are bad lawyers who care nothing for their clients' interests. Too many are in fact.

Oh, since you are ignorant of how litigation works, (or just trolling pretending to be), let me explain how this works. If a judge determines Dominion has a case against Powell, then she is entitled to discovery, but not before. That means she would get to issue subpoenas and call witnesses, should that be necessary. So that question is a bit premature in the process. It is worth noting that a court in Naples, Italy took a full confession from Arturo D'Elia in open court under oath, and received the raw data that was switched. Since that statement was made in open court, it's not hearsay, an out of court statement, and fully admissible evidence in any U.S. court.

First, I'm very aware of how litigation works. Second, are you really going to go down the tinfoil Qtard rabbit hole with fake special forces raids in Germany and Italian spies? Really now? If that's the road you want to travel, you aren't worth my time.

You are implying that Dominion machines were used to steal votes for Trump, and therefore using them to steal votes for Biden didn't happen. It's a strange argument. Considering that the steal occurred with the blessing of the FBI, I don't believe that they would turn a blind eye to anyone cheating to help Trump. Trump won so big, he didn't need anyone to cheat for him.

I'm implying no such thing. You are an idiot if you think such. Read again.

Your assumptions. There is a well known saying: Never ASS/U/ME anything. You assume much which is yet unexplored in any depth. It is difficult to comprehend how Dominion machines were not involved in stealing votes in Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, and Chester and Delaware counties in PA.

No it isn't. Philadelphia, Allegheny, Chester and Delaware didn't use Dominion machines. The fact that you think that they did is quite telling as to your intelligence and "credentials." Philadelphia, Chester, Allegheny all use ES&S machines, not Dominion. Delaware uses Hart InterCivic machines. Not Dominion. In the Dominion counties Trump had a net INCREASE in vote share and vote totals.

(Interestingly enough, Trump increased his voter share in Philadelphia from 2016 from 15.37% to 17.90% and Biden lost more than a percentage point from Hillary. Trump's vote share in Allegheny was nearly identical to his share in 2016. 39.23% vs 39.91%. In Delaware, there was a 1% decrease to 36.15% from 37.18%. Chester had the biggest change (3%) 40.88% from 43.20%.) Again, none of these counties uses Dominion machines.

The truth is an absolute defense, but a trial on the merits of the issue, is the last line of defense. No competent attorney would fail to make the "so what" arguments these lawyers made.

Truth needs to be raised as an affirmative defense in a responsive pleading or it is waived. A motion to dismiss isn't a response pleading, so lets see if Powell raises it after her motion to dismiss is denied.

You have no idea what my credentials are, and I won't repeat them here. Many lawyers pass a bar exam, but aren't competent lawyers, or are bad lawyers who care nothing for their clients' interests. Too many are in fact.

I hear this line often from internet lawyers.