Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Federal judge issues scathing dissent accusing the media of liberal bias and being a 'Democratic Party trumpet', while calling for 1964 Supreme Court landmark decision protecting the press to be overturned
Daily Mail ^ | 19 March 2021 | Karen Ruiz

Posted on 03/20/2021 1:23:45 PM PDT by McGruff

D.C. Circuit Judge Laurence Silberman penned a scathing dissent Friday on a defamation case 


(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: clownbammyjudge; davidstatel; davidtatel; dccircuit; laurencesilberman; mediabias; odiousbamajudge; rapinbilljudge; reaganjudge; srisrinivasan
Why isn't this guy on the Supreme Court?
1 posted on 03/20/2021 1:23:45 PM PDT by McGruff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: McGruff

Good question.


2 posted on 03/20/2021 1:42:56 PM PDT by sauropod (Chance favors the prepared mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

Tough and very needed talk. Unfortunately his vote was with the minority.

Prediction: Nothing will come from this. I hate that.


3 posted on 03/20/2021 1:43:59 PM PDT by upchuck (Republicans better realize the 74 million Trump supporters are not 74 million GOP supporters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGruff
Why isn't this guy on the Supreme Court?
It's a big club and he ain't in it.
4 posted on 03/20/2021 1:46:45 PM PDT by Bratch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGruff
"Absent malice"
5 posted on 03/20/2021 1:50:56 PM PDT by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

“Why isn’t this guy on the Supreme Court?“

Reagan considered Silberman, but after the Democrats borked Bork, he wanted to go with someone easier to confirm and some Republicans indicated they wouldn’t support Silberman, so it was a no go. (Typical GOP lol). George HW Bush considered him, but well, you know HW...


6 posted on 03/20/2021 2:07:06 PM PDT by Stravinsky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

Keep the 1964 decision. It protects the shallow pocketed conservative press against liberal kangaroo courts.


7 posted on 03/20/2021 2:30:42 PM PDT by Socon-Econ (adical Islam, )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

https://hotair.com/archives/karen-townsend/2021/03/20/federal-judge-drops-truth-bomb-american-press-tank-democrats/

This other article has a lot more of what Silberman said.


8 posted on 03/20/2021 2:36:29 PM PDT by DeweyCA ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeweyCA; McGruff

https://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opinions.nsf/C5F7840A6FFFCF648525869D004ECAC5/%24file/19-7132-1890626.pdf


9 posted on 03/20/2021 2:44:32 PM PDT by kiryandil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

First to say: D.C. Circuit Judge Laurence Silberman didn’t kill himself!


10 posted on 03/20/2021 2:45:58 PM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

Where are the younger judges talking like this? Why isnt every conservative completely boycotting the msm and some of them starting their own information bureaus.?.there should be 75 million boycotters and at least 500,000 info. Bureaus. With todays rechnology we dont need embedded msm any more to get true information.
Who needs those talking heads? Cut the cable or link or stream or whatever leftist woke propaganda source you think you need. You will save money, defund them, and source your info from other trusted sources.


11 posted on 03/20/2021 3:48:24 PM PDT by Getready (Wisdom is more valuable than gold and diamonds, and harder to find.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

We have found a replacement for Chief Injustice Judge Dredd Roberts.


12 posted on 03/20/2021 4:16:34 PM PDT by 2CAVTrooper (One Nation, Under Fraud Completely Visible, With Spying and Lying Too All.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

Why isn’t this guy on the Supreme Court?

Because he’s 85.


13 posted on 03/20/2021 6:06:24 PM PDT by The MAGA-Deplorian (Democrats are lawless because Republicans are ball-less!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson