As an academic point, sure. But voting has no effect on the court. The justices do what they will, and have convinced themselves it is the right thing to do. They make up whatever to call all conclusions "constitutional."
The presence of dissenting opinions makes it obvious that there is serious disagreement as to the constitutionality of many decisions, but "it is what it is," and Don;t expect the people have the balls to even offer meaningful civil disobedience.
Justices will do what activist law schools have indoctrinated them to do imo.
Also, thank you for reminding me.
Besides trampling the Electoral College-related 12th Amendment, another major problem with constitutionally undefined political parties is this. They have divided both Houses of Congress, including the Senate.
The significance of the Senate being divided is that activist justices and presidents know that the Senate probably won’t find the 2/3 majority votes to remove them from office if they get impeached by House.